20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ vs Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52

8.4 Winter
WINTERCRAFT WP52+
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP52+
SUV / 4×4* Standard
8.0 Winter
WINTERCRAFT WP52
Kumho
WINTERCRAFT WP52
Passenger car Standard
8.4 WINTERCRAFT WP52+ WINTERCRAFT WP52+
8.0 WINTERCRAFT WP52 WINTERCRAFT WP52
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
8,4
8,0
Discipline comparison
Snow
90 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
40 ≈ average
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
82 +4 % ▲
2 Tests
32 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
83 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
27 ≈ average
6 tests
snow handling
95 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
54 ≈ average
5 tests
Wet
91 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
77 +3 %
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
93 +10 % ▲
2 Tests
82 +6 %
9 tests
Aquaplaning
67 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
wet handling
89 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
61 ≈ average
5 tests
Dry
87 +3 %
3 Tests
94 +3 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
94 +4 %
3 Tests
95 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
23 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
84 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
Ice
60 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test
71 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
61 +1 %
1 test 1 test
72 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Economy
64 +7 % ▲
3 Tests
49 +4 %
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
35 −1 % ▲
3 Tests
7 −3 %
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
65 +9 % ▲
3 Tests
62 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
1 ≈ average
2 Tests
35 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
32 ≈ average
2 Tests
63 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
ride comfort
2 Not measured.
‹
13 Not measured. ▲
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
–
M+S M+S
✓
–
Sound Sound
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
–
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF M+S M+S Sound (noise reduction) Sound* Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* Rim protection Rim protection*
none

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 169 winter tyres

8.4 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
8.0 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Snow
90 +4 % ▲
3 Tests
40 ≈ average
11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
82 +4 % ▲
2 Tests
32 ≈ average
9 tests
snow traction
83 +3 % ▲
2 Tests
27 ≈ average
6 tests
snow handling
95 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
54 ≈ average
5 tests
Wet
91 +6 % ▲
3 Tests
77 +3 %
11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
93 +10 % ▲
2 Tests
82 +6 %
9 tests
Aquaplaning
67 −1 % ▲
2 Tests
16 −6 %
6 tests weakness
wet handling
89 +3 % ▲
1 test 1 test
61 ≈ average
5 tests
Dry
87 +3 %
3 Tests
94 +3 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
94 +4 %
3 Tests
95 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
23 ≈ average
1 test 1 test
84 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
Ice
60 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test
71 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
61 +1 %
1 test 1 test
72 +2 % ▲
2 Tests
Economy
64 +7 % ▲
3 Tests
49 +4 %
7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
35 −1 % ▲
3 Tests
7 −3 %
5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
65 +9 % ▲
3 Tests
62 +7 %
4 Tests
Noise and comfort
1 ≈ average
2 Tests
35 ≈ average ▲
5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
32 ≈ average
2 Tests
63 ≈ average ▲
4 Tests
ride comfort
2 Not measured.
‹
13 Not measured. ▲