20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

WINTERCRAFT WP52+

8.3
PTI – Pneutesty Index
very good ✓ 3 tyre tests
compared with 162 winter tyres
incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only ranking not certain yet (5.–54.)
Price from
16 957 Ft
in 165/70 R14
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
↑

For a more accurate search, please enter your size — select the width, profile and rim diameter above.

Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Select a size and we'll compare prices across shops.

Rating and verdict

How the WinterCraft WP52 plus evaluated

8.3
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,3 / 10 · very good compared with 162 winter tyres
incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only ranking not certain yet (5.–54.)
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Snow 81
+3 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 76
+4 % 3 Tests
snow traction 93
+4 % 2 Tests
snow handling 31
≈ average 1 test
Wet 86
+5 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 92
+9 % 3 Tests
Aquaplaning 25
−4 % 2 Tests
wet handling 69
+4 % 1 test
Dry 97
+2 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 97
+5 % 3 Tests
dry handling 21
−6 % 1 test
Ice 58
from 1 measurement 1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking 58
+1 % 1 test
Economy 18
−3 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 11
−4 % 3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 32
−3 % 3 Tests
Noise and comfort 11
≈ average 2 Tests noise only
what it consists of Noise and comfort (1)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 9
≈ average 2 Tests
Where it is strong
Snowbetter than 81 %
Wetbetter than 86 %
Drybetter than 97 %
Where it falls behind
Economyworse than 82 % · −3 %
Noise and comfortworse than 89 % · ≈ ako priemer

Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based solely on measurements from independent tests.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway

Where Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ stands among comparable tyres

Compared with 42 tyres — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 8,3
Michelin ALPIN 7 8.8 42 410 Ft Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 8.7 54 608 Ft Dunlop WINTER 8.4 28 480 Ft Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 8.3 42 002 Ft Vredestein WINTRAC 8.3 22 451 Ft Hankook W452 Winter i*cept RS2 8.3 25 869 Ft Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 8.3 51 170 Ft This tyre Bf goodrich G-FORCE WINTER2 8.2 27 009 Ft Goodyear ULTRA GRIP 9+ 8.2 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP 9+ 8.2 34 947 Ft Hankook W462 WINTER I*CEPT RS3 8.1 21 389 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO WINTER 2 8.1 45 825 Ft Kleber KRISALP HP3 8.0 23 995 Ft Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 7.9 20 089 Ft Barum POLARIS 6 7.9 27 388 Ft Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 7.7 22 751 Ft Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 7.5 36 596 Ft Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 1 7.5 20 565 Ft Nokian Tyres WR SUV 4 7.5 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV 7.5 44 823 Ft Toyo S944 OBSERVE 7.5 33 876 Ft Michelin LATITUDE ALPIN LA2 7.4 94 971 Ft Nexen WINGUARD SNOW'G WH2 7.3 28 705 Ft Nexen WINGUARD SPORT 2 7.3 43 472 Ft Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 7.2 27 212 Ft Falken EUROWINTER HS01 7.2 41 121 Ft Matador MP93 NORDICCA 7.2 18 170 Ft Barum POLARIS 5 7.2 18 741 Ft Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 7.2 46 027 Ft Vredestein SNOWTRAC 5 7.2 18 928 Ft Michelin ALPIN 5 7.2 42 756 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO WINTER 7.1 31 582 Ft Nexen WINGUARD SNOW'G 3 7.0 18 818 Ft Toyo S954 SNOWPROX SUV 6.9 59 966 Ft Falken EUROWINTER HS01SUV 6.9 Fulda KRISTALL CONTROL HP 2 6.8 23 837 Ft Hankook W320 WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 6.8 33 266 Ft Sava ESKIMO HP 2 6.7 29 355 Ft Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP51 6.7 38 435 Ft Debica FRIGO HP 2 6.6 26 399 Ft Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 6.5 Triangle WINTERX TW401 6.2 26 293 Ft
6,2 median 7,5 8,8
4. rank in the group of 42 compared
83 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+0,8 above the group median group median 7,5
−0,5 behind the best in the group the best has 8,8
Show all tyres in the ranking (42)
  1. 1. 8.8 Michelin ALPIN 7 42 410 Ft
  2. 2. 8.7 Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 54 608 Ft
  3. 3. 8.4 Dunlop WINTER 28 480 Ft
  4. 4. 8.3 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 42 002 Ft
  5. 4. 8.3 Vredestein WINTRAC 22 451 Ft
  6. 4. 8.3 Hankook W452 Winter i*cept RS2 25 869 Ft
  7. 4. 8.3 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ This tyre 51 170 Ft
  8. 8. 8.2 Bf goodrich G-FORCE WINTER2 27 009 Ft
  9. 8. 8.2 Goodyear ULTRA GRIP 9+
  10. 8. 8.2 Goodyear ULTRAGRIP 9+ 34 947 Ft
  11. 11. 8.1 Hankook W462 WINTER I*CEPT RS3 21 389 Ft
  12. 11. 8.1 Pirelli CINTURATO WINTER 2 45 825 Ft
  13. 13. 8.0 Kleber KRISALP HP3 23 995 Ft
  14. 14. 7.9 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 20 089 Ft
  15. 14. 7.9 Barum POLARIS 6 27 388 Ft
  16. 16. 7.7 Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 22 751 Ft
  17. 17. 7.5 Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 36 596 Ft
  18. 17. 7.5 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 1 20 565 Ft
  19. 17. 7.5 Nokian Tyres WR SUV 4
  20. 17. 7.5 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV 44 823 Ft
  21. 17. 7.5 Toyo S944 OBSERVE 33 876 Ft
  22. 22. 7.4 Michelin LATITUDE ALPIN LA2 94 971 Ft
  23. 23. 7.3 Nexen WINGUARD SNOW'G WH2 28 705 Ft
  24. 23. 7.3 Nexen WINGUARD SPORT 2 43 472 Ft
  25. 25. 7.2 Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 27 212 Ft
  26. 25. 7.2 Falken EUROWINTER HS01 41 121 Ft
  27. 25. 7.2 Matador MP93 NORDICCA 18 170 Ft
  28. 25. 7.2 Barum POLARIS 5 18 741 Ft
  29. 25. 7.2 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 46 027 Ft
  30. 25. 7.2 Vredestein SNOWTRAC 5 18 928 Ft
  31. 25. 7.2 Michelin ALPIN 5 42 756 Ft
  32. 32. 7.1 Pirelli CINTURATO WINTER 31 582 Ft
  33. 33. 7.0 Nexen WINGUARD SNOW'G 3 18 818 Ft
  34. 34. 6.9 Toyo S954 SNOWPROX SUV 59 966 Ft
  35. 34. 6.9 Falken EUROWINTER HS01SUV
  36. 36. 6.8 Fulda KRISTALL CONTROL HP 2 23 837 Ft
  37. 36. 6.8 Hankook W320 WINTER I*CEPT EVO2 33 266 Ft
  38. 38. 6.7 Sava ESKIMO HP 2 29 355 Ft
  39. 38. 6.7 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP51 38 435 Ft
  40. 40. 6.6 Debica FRIGO HP 2 26 399 Ft
  41. 41. 6.5 Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
  42. 42. 6.2 Triangle WINTERX TW401 26 293 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

16 957 Ft ÷ 41 114 km × 100
41 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 165/70 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread WINTERCRAFT WP52+
Season Winter
Vehicle type SUV / 4×4
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 17.07.2025
Product launch date (gen.) 26.08.2025
Available technologies

Select a size to display technologies.

Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 2×
Wins 0×
Top 3 0×
Average placement 9,0
2026
6. place
AvD winter tire test 225/45 R17 2026
15 tyres
Detail →
12. place
ADAC Winter Tyre Test 185/65 R15 2026
16 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Select a size and we'll show how its price has evolved.

User reviews

What owners say

4,2
★★★★☆
from 5 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
41 114 km
Reliability:confidence-high
MA
ma***@interia.pl
Audi A3 Sportback · 225/45 R17 · 4 268 km
★★★★☆

I have to buy a new tyre because Hankook Winter i*recept rs3 had the quality issues.. Hankook generates vibration and radial runout.. After very positive reviews and test results I decide to buy Kumho Wintercraft WP52+ in the size 225 45 r17.
I made one season on this tyres and had opportunity to test this tyres in each conditions, because this year winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet. Quieter than my Sommer Falken Fk520...
The grip on the dry and wet I great, the tyres are very comfortable. And the quaility of the tyre is great. Because of the bad experience with falken and Hankook. I decided to check the tyre on Hunter road force test. And the results were impressing. 25N,10N,5N!. One tyre was worse because have rubber rissees form production and has 85 N... But I got information that this rubber rissees will go out after the driving and it was true.
I am very satisfied with this tyres. I forgot to mention about snow and ice grip and it was very good. On the ice usually only the studs help, but during this winter I don't have any issues with grip and handling. Well done Kumho.
I didn't evaluate the grip because it is the first season and I didn't make as many km as usually.
Poprawiona i bardziej naturalna wersja po angielsku:
I had to buy new tyres because the Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 had quality issues. The Hankooks generated vibrations and had radial runout problems. After reading many positive reviews and test results, I decided to buy the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ in size 225/45 R17.
I used these tyres for one season and had the opportunity to test them in all conditions, because this winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet - even quieter than my summer Falken FK520 tyres.
The grip on dry and wet roads is great, and the tyres are very comfortable. The build quality is also excellent. Because of my bad experiences with Falken and Hankook, I decided to check the tyres using a Hunter Road Force test, and the results were impressive: 25 N, 10 N, and 5 N. One tyre performed worse because it had rubber residues from production and showed 85 N, but I was informed that the issue would disappear after some driving - and it did.
I am very satisfied with these tyres. I almost forgot to mention the snow and ice performance, which was also very good. On ice, usually only studded tyres provide perfect grip, but during this winter I had no issues with traction or handling. Well done, Kumho.
I didn’t evaluate tread wear yet because this was only the first season and I haven’t driven as many kilometres as usual.

17
17***@noreg.com
Volvo V60 T6 AWD · 235/45 R17 · 8 047 km
★★★★☆

Great tyres for the cost, transforms car in winter with great grip, water shedding and ride comfort

CO
co***@geekoland.fr
MG HS · 225/55 R19 · 8 047 km
★★★★★

Comparing the brands like Continental, Bridgestone, Hankook, Michelin, we are very impressed by the progression of Kumho. The wp52+ tested in France in the Vosges and in the city is impressive. Tire and report quality price incomparable.

VA
va***@gmail.com
BMW 530i · 245/45 R18 · 1 609 km
★★★★☆

Mounted these this season on my BMW 530i xDrive, and after a few hundred kilometers of mixed driving, including mountain roads with tight hairpins, wet tarmac, and temperatures between 3–5°C, I’m genuinely impressed. With all driver aids turned off, the grip was annoyingly good; no matter how much I tried to unsettle the car, it simply stuck to the road.
Coming from Continental run-flats, the comfort improvement is immediately noticeable. The ride feels more compliant, and surprisingly, the road noise is minimal barely distinguishable from my summer Michelin Primacy 3s. That was an unexpected bonus.
As for fuel consumption, I can’t make a direct comparison since my winter setup is 245/45 R18 all around, while summer is 245 front / 275 rear on 19-inch wheels. Still, the overall consumption seems similar.
So far, the WP52+ have been flawless in all conditions tested wet grip, handling, comfort, and noise are top-notch. I’ll post an update once I’ve had the chance to test them on snow and ice, but as it stands, Kumho really nailed it with this tire.

IV
iv***@gmail.com
BMW 320d touring · 205/55 R16 · 3 219 km
★★★★☆

Best deal ever!
Tyres are premium feel, Class A wet grip, drive like a german tyre on a BMW Touring 320D. Made in Korea.
The only other Class A wet grip tyre is Bridgestone, with $55 more per tyre.
Kumho is the top-brand of the corporation, the budget version is Marshall.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in