Comparison Linglong Sport Master 4S M+S vs Vredestein QUATRAC PRO

Linglong

Overall rating

PTI – Pneutesty Index

–

7,6

Discipline comparison

Snow

–

28 −3 %

12 tests

what it consists of Snow (3)

snow braking

–

24 −4 %

12 tests

snow traction

–

18 −4 %

8 tests

snow handling

–

36 −1 %

11 tests

Wet

–

82 +6 %

14 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

–

85 +9 %

12 tests

Aquaplaning

–

32 −2 %

11 tests

wet handling

–

87 +3 %

11 tests

Dry

–

66 ≈ average

14 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

–

55 ≈ average

12 tests

dry handling

–

70 ≈ average

11 tests

Ice

–

26 from 1 measurement

1 test

what it consists of Ice (1)

ice braking

–

28 −5 %

1 test

Economy

–

6 −6 %

11 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

–

5 −5 %

11 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

–

16 −13 %

2 Tests

Noise and comfort

–

83 ≈ average

10 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

–

91 ≈ average

10 tests

ride comfort

–

53 Not measured.

Technologies

Reinforced profile

✓ Only in some sizes

3PMSF

–

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

M+S

–

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

–

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

Rim protection

–

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

Suitable for EVs

–

✓ Only in some sizes iba táto

Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 105 all-season tyres

Linglong Sport Master 4S M+S No PTI yet

Vredestein QUATRAC PRO

Snow

–

28 −3 %

12 tests

what it consists of Snow (3)

snow braking

–

24 −4 %

12 tests

snow traction

–

18 −4 %

8 tests

snow handling

–

36 −1 %

11 tests

Wet

–

82 +6 %

14 tests

what it consists of Wet (3)

wet braking

–

85 +9 %

12 tests

Aquaplaning

–

32 −2 %

11 tests

wet handling

–

87 +3 %

11 tests

Dry

–

66 ≈ average

14 tests

what it consists of Dry (2)

dry braking

–

55 ≈ average

12 tests

dry handling

–

70 ≈ average

11 tests

Ice

–

26 from 1 measurement

1 test

what it consists of Ice (1)

ice braking

–

28 −5 %

1 test

Economy

–

6 −6 %

11 tests

what it consists of Economy (2)

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

–

5 −5 %

11 tests

durability (wear and abrasion)

–

16 −13 %

2 Tests

Noise and comfort

–

83 ≈ average

10 tests

what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

–

91 ≈ average

10 tests

ride comfort

–

53 Not measured.