4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Nexen N'FERA RU1 vs Kumho PS91 ECSTA

5.4 Summer
N'FERA RU1
Nexen
N'FERA RU1
SUV / 4×4* Sport*
7.1 Summer
PS91 ECSTA
Kumho
PS91 ECSTA
Passenger car* Sport
5.4 N'FERA RU1 N'FERA RU1
7.1 PS91 ECSTA PS91 ECSTA
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
5,4
7,1
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Wet Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Dry Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Economy Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Noise and comfort Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Wet Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Dry Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Economy Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
33 +2 %
3 Tests
65 +4 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
41 +2 %
3 Tests
62 +4 % ▲
6 tests
Aquaplaning
30 −2 %
1 Test 1 test
57 +2 % ▲
3 Tests
wet handling
39 ≈ average
2 Tests
46 +1 % ▲
5 tests
Dry
38 −1 %
3 Tests
71 +3 % ▲
6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
44 −2 %
3 Tests
76 +4 % ▲
6 tests
dry handling
23 −1 %
3 Tests
46 ≈ average ▲
6 tests
Economy
17 from 1 measurement ▲
1 Test 1 test no wear measurement
15 −11 %
3 Tests no wear measurement
what it consists of Economy (1)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
17 −17 % ▲
1 Test 1 test
8 −13 %
3 Tests
Noise and comfort
26 from 1 measurement
1 Test 1 test noise only
50 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
44 ≈ average
1 Test 1 test
64 ≈ average ▲
3 Tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
20 Not measured.
Technologies
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Wet Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Dry Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Economy Nexen N'FERA RU1 – Noise and comfort Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Wet Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Dry Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Economy Kumho PS91 ECSTA – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

Nexen N'FERA RU1 from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 84 of 256
33 +1,5 %
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA from 17 measurements · 6 tests
beats 165 of 256
65 +3,9 %

Kumho PS91 ECSTA is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Nexen N'FERA RU1 3 tests
beats 104 of 256
41 +1,8 %
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA 6 tests
beats 159 of 256
62 +3,9 %

Aquaplaning

Nexen N'FERA RU1 1 test
beats 61 of 205
30 −2,2 %
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA 3 tests
beats 116 of 205
57 +1,9 %

wet handling

Nexen N'FERA RU1 2 tests
beats 79 of 204
39 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA 5 tests
beats 94 of 204
46 +1,2 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Nexen N'FERA RU1 from 6 measurements · 3 tests
beats 97 of 257
38 −1,0 %
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA from 12 measurements · 6 tests
beats 181 of 257
71 +3,1 %

Kumho PS91 ECSTA is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Nexen N'FERA RU1 3 tests
beats 111 of 256
44 −1,9 %
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA 6 tests
beats 193 of 256
76 +4,0 %

dry handling

Nexen N'FERA RU1 3 tests
beats 46 of 203
23 −1,4 %
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA 6 tests
beats 92 of 203
46 ≈ average

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Nexen N'FERA RU1 from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test no wear measurement
beats 35 of 207
17 from 1 measurement
Kumho PS91 ECSTA from 3 measurements · 3 tests no wear measurement
beats 31 of 207
15 −11,2 %

Nexen N'FERA RU1 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Nexen N'FERA RU1 1 test
beats 35 of 205
17 −16,9 %
Kumho PS91 ECSTA 3 tests
beats 15 of 205
8 −13,3 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Nexen N'FERA RU1 from 1 measurement · 1 test 1 test noise only
beats 53 of 204
26 from 1 measurement
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA from 3 measurements · 3 tests
beats 101 of 204
50 ≈ average

Kumho PS91 ECSTA is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

Nexen N'FERA RU1 1 test
beats 89 of 202
44 ≈ average
🏆 Kumho PS91 ECSTA 3 tests
beats 128 of 202
64 ≈ average

ride comfort

Nexen N'FERA RU1
– Not measured.
Kumho PS91 ECSTA
beats 26 of 134
20 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.