20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2 vs Vredestein QUATRAC PRO

Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
7,2
7,6
Discipline comparison
Snow
47 ≈ average ▲
28 −3 %
12 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 Not measured. ▲
24 −4 %
12 tests
snow traction
– Not measured.
18 −4 %
8 tests
snow handling
55 Not measured. ▲
36 −1 %
11 tests
Wet
61 +4 %
82 +6 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
67 Not measured.
85 +9 % ▲
12 tests
Aquaplaning
29 Not measured.
32 −2 % ▲
11 tests
wet handling
66 Not measured.
87 +3 % ▲
11 tests
Dry
53 ≈ average
66 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
45 Not measured.
55 ≈ average ▲
12 tests
dry handling
68 Not measured.
70 ≈ average ▲
11 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
26 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
– Not measured.
28 −5 %
1 test 1 test
Economy
52 +3 % ▲
6 −6 %
11 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
34 Not measured. ▲
5 −5 %
11 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
64 Not measured. ▲
16 −13 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
30 ≈ average
83 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
43 Not measured.
91 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
53 Not measured.
Technologies
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓
✓ Only in some sizes
Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
✓
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
M+S M+S
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
OE OE
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Rim protection Rim protection
–
✓ Only in some sizes iba táto
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

3PMSF 3PMSF Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*
3PMSF 3PMSF* Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* M+S M+S* OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 105 all-season tyres

7.2 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO 2
new model – predecessor's PTI
7.6 Vredestein QUATRAC PRO
noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Snow
47 ≈ average ▲
28 −3 %
12 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking
48 Not measured. ▲
24 −4 %
12 tests
snow traction
– Not measured.
18 −4 %
8 tests
snow handling
55 Not measured. ▲
36 −1 %
11 tests
Wet
61 +4 %
82 +6 % ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
67 Not measured.
85 +9 % ▲
12 tests
Aquaplaning
29 Not measured.
32 −2 % ▲
11 tests
wet handling
66 Not measured.
87 +3 % ▲
11 tests
Dry
53 ≈ average
66 ≈ average ▲
14 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
45 Not measured.
55 ≈ average ▲
12 tests
dry handling
68 Not measured.
70 ≈ average ▲
11 tests
Ice
– Not measured.
26 from 1 measurement
1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking
– Not measured.
28 −5 %
1 test 1 test
Economy
52 +3 % ▲
6 −6 %
11 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
34 Not measured. ▲
5 −5 %
11 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
64 Not measured. ▲
16 −13 %
2 Tests
Noise and comfort
30 ≈ average
83 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
43 Not measured.
91 ≈ average ▲
10 tests
ride comfort
– Not measured.
53 Not measured.