4 600+ tyres 100+ tests 460 000+ prices tracked

Comparison Yokohama V105 vs Yokohama V107

6.2 Summer
V105
Yokohama
V105
Passenger car* Sport
7.3 Summer
V107
Yokohama
V107
Passenger car* Sport
6.2 V105 V105
7.3 V107 V107
Overall rating
PTI – Pneutesty Index
6,2
7,3
Tyre profiles
Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama V105 – Wet Yokohama V105 – Dry Yokohama V105 – Economy Yokohama V105 – Noise and comfort Yokohama V107 – Wet Yokohama V107 – Dry Yokohama V107 – Economy Yokohama V107 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Discipline comparison
Wet
37 ≈ average
4 Tests
69 +6 % ▲
12 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking
22 −1 %
4 Tests
69 +7 % ▲
8 tests
Aquaplaning
56 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
40 +1 %
9 tests
wet handling
55 +1 % ▲
3 Tests
47 +2 %
7 tests
Dry
64 +1 %
4 Tests
98 +6 % ▲
12 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking
54 ≈ average
4 Tests
99 +7 % ▲
8 tests
dry handling
85 +2 %
2 Tests
96 +2 % ▲
8 tests
Economy
8 −13 % ▲
2 Tests no wear measurement
2 −18 %
8 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)
5 −17 % ▲
2 Tests
0 −20 %
8 tests
durability (wear and abrasion)
– Not measured.
20 −12 %
5 tests
Noise and comfort
1 −2 %
3 Tests
3 −1 % ▲
7 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise)
11 −2 % ▲
3 Tests
5 −1 %
5 tests
ride comfort
5 Not measured. ▲
4 Not measured.
Technologies
OE OE
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Rim protection Rim protection
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
✓ Only in some sizes
✓ Only in some sizes
3PMSF 3PMSF
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
–
M+S M+S
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
–
ROF ROF
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
–
Sound Sound
✓ Only in some sizes this one only
–
Comparison

Technologies

Highlighted in green — this tyre has these in addition to the others; grey ones are shared by all.

OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile* 3PMSF 3PMSF* M+S M+S* ROF (run-flat technology) ROF* Sound (noise reduction) Sound*
OE OE* Rim protection Rim protection* Reinforced profile Reinforced profile*

* Only in some sizes

Comparison

Tyre profiles

The shape will show at a glance which of the selected tyres is stronger in which aspect.

Wet Dry Economy Noise and comfort best of the selected middle of the selected Yokohama V105 – Wet Yokohama V105 – Dry Yokohama V105 – Economy Yokohama V105 – Noise and comfort Yokohama V107 – Wet Yokohama V107 – Dry Yokohama V107 – Economy Yokohama V107 – Noise and comfort

Click on a tyre name in the chart to hide or show it. The axis compares only the selected tyres with each other — the edge represents the best of them. The shape here doesn't indicate how a tyre performs overall, but which of the selected ones is better.

Comparison

Discipline comparison

A higher number and a longer line always mean a better tyre — also for noise (quieter), consumption (more efficient) and wear (lasts longer). compared with 257 summer tyres

For example, wet braking, aquaplaning, and handling — showing what makes up the category score.

Wet

Yokohama V105 from 10 measurements · 4 tests
beats 95 of 256
37 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V107 from 36 measurements · 12 tests
beats 176 of 256
69 +5,8 %

Yokohama V107 is the best.

Subcategories wet

wet braking

Yokohama V105 4 tests
beats 56 of 256
22 −1,3 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 177 of 256
69 +6,8 %

Aquaplaning

🏆 Yokohama V105 3 tests
beats 114 of 205
56 +1,2 %
Yokohama V107 9 tests
beats 82 of 205
40 +1,4 %

wet handling

🏆 Yokohama V105 3 tests
beats 112 of 204
55 +1,4 %
Yokohama V107 7 tests
beats 96 of 204
47 +1,9 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Dry

Yokohama V105 from 6 measurements · 4 tests
beats 165 of 257
64 +1,3 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 from 16 measurements · 12 tests
beats 252 of 257
98 +5,8 %

Yokohama V107 is the best.

Subcategories dry

dry braking

Yokohama V105 4 tests
beats 138 of 256
54 ≈ average
🏆 Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 252 of 256
99 +7,0 %

dry handling

Yokohama V105 2 tests
beats 173 of 203
85 +1,7 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 195 of 203
96 +2,4 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Economy

🏆 Yokohama V105 from 2 measurements · 2 tests no wear measurement
beats 16 of 207
8 −12,6 %
Yokohama V107 from 16 measurements · 8 tests
beats 4 of 207
2 −17,5 %

Yokohama V105 is the best.

Subcategories economy

efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption)

🏆 Yokohama V105 2 tests
beats 9 of 205
5 −16,6 %
Yokohama V107 8 tests
beats 0 of 205
0 −19,7 %

durability (wear and abrasion)

Yokohama V105
– Not measured.
Yokohama V107 5 tests
beats 25 of 129
20 −11,6 %

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.

Noise and comfort

Yokohama V105 from 3 measurements · 3 tests
beats 2 of 204
1 −2,1 %
🏆 Yokohama V107 from 5 measurements · 7 tests
beats 6 of 204
3 −1,1 %

Yokohama V107 is the best.

Subcategories noise and comfort

quietness (measured and subjective noise)

🏆 Yokohama V105 3 tests
beats 22 of 202
11 −2,1 %
Yokohama V107 5 tests
beats 10 of 202
5 −1,1 %

ride comfort

🏆 Yokohama V105
beats 6 of 134
5 Not measured.
Yokohama V107
beats 5 of 134
4 Not measured.

A high percentile in one subcategory and a low one in another gives an average value — here you can see which one determined it.