Hankook Upper mid-range K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.
Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.
Price comparison across shops
Current prices for size 255/45 R20.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the Ventus Evo evaluated
what it consists of Wet (3)
what it consists of Dry (2)
what it consists of Economy (2)
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.
Where Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV stands in size 255/45 R20
Compared with 21 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.
Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 9.9 69 295 Ft This tyre
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 9.6 83 428 Ft
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 5 9.2 85 697 Ft
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO 8.7 77 407 Ft
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT 8.6 70 606 Ft
Hankook K127A VENTUS S1 EVO3 SUV 8.5 75 051 Ft
Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) Sports car 8.2
Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 8.1 76 850 Ft
Dunlop SPORT MAXX RT2 8.0 89 143 Ft
Kumho ECSTA PS71 7.9 56 694 Ft
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 3 7.7
Toyo PROXES SPORT 2 7.6 61 566 Ft
Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 7.5 48 774 Ft
Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 7.5 68 964 Ft
Vredestein ULTRAC VORTI+ 7.3 68 326 Ft
Yokohama V107 7.3 69 769 Ft
Nexen N'FERA SPORT SUV 7.0 60 632 Ft
Laufenn LK01 S FIT EQ 6.8
Nexen N'FERA RU1 5.4 57 167 Ft
Triangle TH202 5.4 33 713 Ft
Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport 5.3 46 462 Ft Show all tyres in the ranking (21)
- 1. 9.9 69 295 Ft
- 2. 9.6 83 428 Ft +14 133 Ft
- 3. 9.2 85 697 Ft +16 402 Ft
- 4. 8.7 77 407 Ft +8 111 Ft
- 5. 8.6 70 606 Ft +1 311 Ft
- 6. 8.5 75 051 Ft +5 756 Ft
- 7. 8.2
- 8. 8.1 76 850 Ft +7 555 Ft
- 9. 8.0 89 143 Ft +19 848 Ft
- 10. 7.9 56 694 Ft −12 601 Ft
- 11. 7.7
- 12. 7.6 61 566 Ft −7 729 Ft
- 13. 7.5 48 774 Ft −20 521 Ft
- 13. 7.5 68 964 Ft −331 Ft
- 15. 7.3 68 326 Ft −969 Ft
- 15. 7.3 69 769 Ft +474 Ft
- 17. 7.0 60 632 Ft −8 663 Ft
- 18. 6.8
- 19. 5.4 57 167 Ft −12 129 Ft
- 19. 5.4 33 713 Ft −35 582 Ft
- 21. 5.3 46 462 Ft −22 833 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 255/45 R20 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Of the tyres compared, Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV has the lowest cost per 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Sport
With sport tyres, grip in every situation is what decides — under hard acceleration, under braking, in the dry and in the wet. Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV belongs to this group. Stability at higher speeds and precision through corners come on top of that. One thing drivers often underestimate when buying: grip comes from a softer compound, and a softer compound wears faster. Where a standard tyre covers roughly 40,000 km, a sport tyre manages about 20,000 to 30,000 km — and considerably less with a sharper driving style or a heavier, more powerful car.
Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Which tests it appeared in
Auto Bild How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 255/45 R20.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
<p>I have used this tyre in Germany for 13000km, in tempatures ranging from 4-40C. Excellent dry and wet grip. Also the price is very competitive, comfort ofcourse is bad because of the low profile tyresize.</p>
I was previously using the 2025 production Michelin Primacy 5. Now I've switched to Hankook Ventus Evo. In terms of comfort and noise, it definitely doesn't fall short of the Primacy 5. However, in wet and dry braking grip, the Hankook Ventus Evo 3 is superior. I highly recommend it to everyone; it ranks among the rare products that are worth the price.
<p>Grip and feedback is excellent, wear is less than I expected and the noise level and rolling resistance is low as promised and what I bought them for. Downsides: They are not great but not bad either on aquaplanning and they can be a bit unsure of themselves on very bad surfaces.</p>
<p>One year and approx. 10.000 miles later, the Hankooks are still unbeleivable. Mega grip in wet and dry conditions still much better then the Michelin's, in the winter I have use other tyres. Comfort wise, noise is still lesser then the OEM Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tyres, the ride is not as good as the Michelin's but still very good, as far a 18" 40 series tyr can be comfortable.
The wear is as far as it looks until now better then the Michelin's too.</p>
<p>I had previously had Michelin Pilot Sport 3 S (BMW Star marked). Wanted to switch away from Runflat tires. Compared to them, definetly more comfortable, quieter and have better grip. The steering response is worse than the PS3S-s but that's probably due to softer sidewals.</p>