Hankook Upper mid-range K137A VENTUS EVO SUV
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.
Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.
B 
A 
B Price from 65 001 Ft 
Reinforced profile 
Rim protection Price comparison across shops
Current prices for size 255/50 R19.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the Ventus Evo evaluated
Skóre vychádza z 11 nezávislých testov a z 19 recenzií vodičov. ?
The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.
Off road good 95,1 Wet very good 97,7 Value weaker 82,8 Comfort very good 97 
Kde stojí Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV v rozmere 255/50 R19
Porovnané s 25 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna aj zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.
Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 9.7 65 001 Ft Táto pneumatika 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 9.7 63 478 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT EVO 9.5 64 731 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT 9.4 63 238 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 5 9.3 91 761 Ft 
Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) S.C. 9.1 77 523 Ft 
Hankook K127C VENTUS S1 EVO3 SUV 8.9 63 669 Ft 
Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 8.9 50 823 Ft 
Yokohama V107 8.9 59 676 Ft 
Toyo PROXES SPORT 2 8.9 51 928 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 3 SUV 8.6 
Dunlop SPORT MAXX RT2 SUV 8.5 61 765 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 2 SUV 4X 8.5 61 133 Ft 
Michelin LATITUDE SPORT 3 8.5 66 351 Ft 
Kumho ECSTA PS71 8.5 48 490 Ft 
Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 8.4 69 143 Ft 
Vredestein ULTRAC VORTI+ 8.2 
Bridgestone DUELER H/P SPORT 8.1 
Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 8.1 57 490 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA SPORT SUV 8.1 49 270 Ft 
Laufenn LK01B S FIT EQ 7.9 49 581 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) SUV 4X4 7.4 85 668 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA RU1 6.7 49 675 Ft 
Sailun ATREZZO ZSR SUV (SU18) 5.4 51 786 Ft 
Arivo ULTRA ARZ5 4.9 36 431 Ft Arivo ULTRA ARZ5 36 431 Ft −28 570 Ft 9.7 najlepšia v skupine Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 65 001 Ft Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (25)
- 1. 9.7 65 001 Ft
- 1. 9.7 63 478 Ft −1 523 Ft
- 3. 9.5 64 731 Ft −271 Ft
- 4. 9.4 63 238 Ft −1 763 Ft
- 5. 9.3 91 761 Ft +26 760 Ft
- 6. 9.1 77 523 Ft +12 522 Ft
- 7. 8.9 63 669 Ft −1 332 Ft
- 7. 8.9 50 823 Ft −14 178 Ft
- 7. 8.9 59 676 Ft −5 325 Ft
- 7. 8.9 51 928 Ft −13 073 Ft
- 11. 8.6
- 12. 8.5 61 765 Ft −3 236 Ft
- 12. 8.5 61 133 Ft −3 868 Ft
- 12. 8.5 66 351 Ft +1 350 Ft
- 12. 8.5 48 490 Ft −16 511 Ft
- 16. 8.4 69 143 Ft +4 141 Ft
- 17. 8.2
- 18. 8.1
- 18. 8.1 57 490 Ft −7 511 Ft
- 18. 8.1 49 270 Ft −15 731 Ft
- 21. 7.9 49 581 Ft −15 420 Ft
- 22. 7.4 85 668 Ft +20 667 Ft
- 23. 6.7 49 675 Ft −15 326 Ft
- 24. 5.4 51 786 Ft −13 216 Ft
- 25. 4.9 36 431 Ft −28 570 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 255/50 R19 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Spomedzi porovnávaných má Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV najnižšiu cenu na 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Sport
With sport tyres, grip in every situation is what decides — under hard acceleration, under braking, in the dry and in the wet. Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV belongs to this group. Stability at higher speeds and precision through corners come on top of that. One thing drivers often underestimate when buying: grip comes from a softer compound, and a softer compound wears faster. Where a standard tyre covers roughly 40,000 km, a sport tyre manages about 20,000 to 30,000 km — and considerably less with a sharper driving style or a heavier, more powerful car.
B A B (71 dB) Konkurencia
Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.
Which tests it appeared in
2× 5× 2. place 
Auto Bild 
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 255/50 R19.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
<p>Grip and feedback is excellent, wear is less than I expected and the noise level and rolling resistance is low as promised and what I bought them for. Downsides: They are not great but not bad either on aquaplanning and they can be a bit unsure of themselves on very bad surfaces.</p>
<p>One year and approx. 10.000 miles later, the Hankooks are still unbeleivable. Mega grip in wet and dry conditions still much better then the Michelin's, in the winter I have use other tyres. Comfort wise, noise is still lesser then the OEM Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tyres, the ride is not as good as the Michelin's but still very good, as far a 18" 40 series tyr can be comfortable.
The wear is as far as it looks until now better then the Michelin's too.</p>
<p>I had previously had Michelin Pilot Sport 3 S (BMW Star marked). Wanted to switch away from Runflat tires. Compared to them, definetly more comfortable, quieter and have better grip. The steering response is worse than the PS3S-s but that's probably due to softer sidewals.</p>
<p>I have replaced Bridgestone Turanza T005A with a set of these for this season. So far, I've driven them for about 3 months...</p><p>From my initial impressions, these tyres have an amazing amount of grip in the dry. I was not unhappy with dry grip of the Turanzas, but these are signficantly better. In the wet, considering they are new and the tread is pretty fresh, they also grip well. Went through 2 situations with a heavy rain and I didn't really have to alter my driving much...</p><p>Regarding efficiency, these are not great compared to the Turanzas... I was able to occasionally get below 5.5 l/100 km with those, which is not happening with these new Hankooks. I'd consider that a tradeoff for the grip (can't have everything). The efficiency is not terrible though, I think my fuel consumption went up by a bit less than 10% (something like 0.4 l / 100km).</p><p>Comfort is fine. They're slightly stiffer than the Bridgestones, but not still acceptable... They seem to also be a bit noisier than the Bridgestones, but that might also be the car getting older...</p><p>Most of my driving happens on motorways and some backroads...</p>
<p>Fitted as replacements for the factory Toyo Proxes R51A (215/45R18) after 5 years and 52,000km. I could only find the Hankooks in 225/45R18, which is a mild plus-size on the standard rim and has caused zero issues.</p><p>Price first, because it's the strangest part. These were around 40% cheaper than replacing like for like with Toyo, Kumho and other mid-range brands. For context, Winrun, an actual budget brand, was only $30 a tyre cheaper. A current generation premium tyre at borderline budget pricing is an absolute steal, and it seems the Hankook badge just isn't strong enough in Australia to command what the product deserves. Long may that continue.</p><p>The difference from the Toyos was obvious on the first drive. Everything improved at once: comfort, noise, dry grip, and especially wet grip. The Toyos were honestly always dangerous in the wet despite still having 6mm of tread, sliding and slipping on a car with modest power. The Hankooks are planted in conditions that used to require real caution. Steering is slightly heavier but far more communicative, and the ride settles over bumps in one motion instead of jiggling.</p><p>What impresses most is the breadth. It has the grip and precision to suit a sports oriented car but rides and sounds along like a touring tyre. I run the previous Ventus S1 evo3 on my Volvo SUV and rate them highly, and these are a clear step better again.</p><p>No hesitation recommending these for anything from a family hatch to something much quicker. At Australian pricing they might be the best value tyre on the market right now.</p>
Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?
Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.
Sign in