Kleber Mid-range Dynaxer Hp3
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Pre zvolenú kombináciu momentálne nemáme variant. Skúste iný profil alebo priemer ráfika.
Price comparison across shops
In your size 195/65 R15 this tyre is currently not sold by any of the e-shops we track.
No problem — take a look at direct alternatives among the competitors, or at how the tyre performed in tests.
How the Dynaxer HP 3 evaluated
noise and comfort: only 20 % measured incomplete measurement: comfort from noise only 
last test 2020 
Wet Rozpad disciplíny „Wet“
Dry Rozpad disciplíny „Dry“
Economy Rozpad disciplíny „Economy“
Noise and comfort Rozpad disciplíny „Noise and comfort“
Wet worse than 76 % Dry worse than 78 % Noise and comfort worse than 81 % Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based on measurements from independent tests; for tyres with few tests it also partly considers the brand's class.
Technical information
Focus: Standard
The largest and best-selling category, and Kleber Dynaxer Hp3 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.
E 
C 
(69 dB) No technologies are listed for this size.
Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Successor to the model you are viewing
The tyre you are viewing already has a successor. We recommend choosing the more advanced model:
How the price has evolved
We don't have price history for this size yet.
What owners say
I’ve been using the Kleber Dynaxer HP3 (185/65 R15) on my 1997 Nissan Primera P11 for the past 10 years, covering around 40,000 kilometres, mostly in city traffic and on the Autobahn. Throughout the entire period, the tyres have been very reliable and consistent. They also had remarkably low wear in my use case. The tread depth is still good, and I’m only replacing them now due to their age. In terms of tread I could easily drive them for several more years. I drive in a fairly relaxed manner (mostly 100-120 km/h on the Autobahn, and rarely exceeding 140 km/h) and I’ve never encountered a situation (wet or dry) where the tyres felt unstable or unsafe. They also did well during a few emergency stops. They were reasonably priced in my tyre size and I'd buy them (or the successors) again without any hesitation.
Very durable tyre, this was XL, lasted for 39tkm.
Would buy again...
Excelence tyre, I bought them before 5 years and I have installed on a mazda 6 2003 1,8. At the begining tires was so shoft at feedback and had very high level of comfort. It was like driving a two dimension higher profile. This sense last for 1-2 months. After this time tires become a bit harder than the first driving days.The most significant about this brand was the low level of wear. After 5 years have 5mm and nothing on them remind their constracting year.
They were 30% cheaper than any premium tyre and FOR THEIR PRICE they were really good, and wear is a strong feat, as well as dry grip and road feedback and prediction. Wet handling is ok, but would advise caution. Climate is mostly hot here in Greece, so their weak point, wet handling and braking doesn't appear much. Comfort is ok. Recommended for budget solution. Was driving them 30.000 Km in the city and about 20.000 Km Country roads, almost always to their limits. Depends on the driver, but I was really pleased with these tyres.
Bought these as cheapest 95C XL i could find for my ford galaxy 2.3 petrol+lpg in 2015. First year the tyres were superb in both dry and wet. But 2016 and 2017 wet grip has deteriorated. Now 2018 wet got a bot better. Drove 25 thousand miles on them. All are in the 3-4mm range left, with 2-3mm on the sides. Galaxy is quite a heavy car, and for summer holidays we pack it bigtime. Have always pumped them 2,8-3,5 bar so the sidewall wear is strange here. I will run them down this year. For a budget tyre they offer good grip and in corners they are predictable. Wet handling that deteriorated quickly is a big minus. Also wear in 20000miles seems big, though galaxy is quite heavy so i would attribute the wear to this factor.