19 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 120+ tests 280 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

ECSTA HS52

9.0
Overall score ✓ 8 tyre tests
Rolling resistance Wet grip Noise
4,0
★★★★☆
21 driver reviews
Price from
30 960 Ft
in 225/55 R16
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 225/55 R16 Speed / Load: 95W
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 30 960 Ft
View prices →
Your size 225/55 R16 Speed / Load: 95W XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 35 424 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Your size 225/55 R16 Speed / Load: 99W XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 37 386 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile
Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Current prices for size 225/55 R16.

Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.

Rating and verdict

How the Ecsta HS52 evaluated

Skóre vychádza z 8 nezávislých testov a z 22 recenzií vodičov. ?

9.0
Overall score 9,0 / 10 6 disciplín meraných v nezávislých testoch. Recenzie vodičov sa premietajú do celkového skóre.
✓ Very reliable
60 70 80 90 100
Dry
Dry
98,2
Manoeuvring
Manoeuvring
97,9
Comfort
Comfort
95,8
Braking
Braking
95,2
Wet
Wet
93,3
Value
Value
79,1
very weak60–81 weaker81–89 average89–93 good93–96 very good96–98 top tier98–100

The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.

Where it shines
Wet Wet good 93,3
Dry Dry top tier 98,2
!Where it falls short
Value Value very weak 79,1
Comfort Comfort good 95,8
🏆 Trophies from tests calculated from 8 tests
Top 3
Top 3 placement in the test
Recommended
Recommended
Best in the dry
Best in the dry
✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway

Kde stojí Kumho HS52 ECSTA v rozmere 225/55 R16

Porovnané s 50 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna aj zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.

najslabšianajlepšia
Táto pneumatika 9,0 30 960 Ft
Falken ZIEX ZE320 9.4 43 959 Ft Kumho HS52 ECSTA 9.0 30 960 Ft Táto pneumatika Nokian Tyres WETPROOF 1 9.0 45 061 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 8.9 56 274 Ft Hankook K125 ventus Prime3 8.8 Michelin PRIMACY 4 8.8 71 690 Ft Firestone ROADHAWK 2 8.7 41 821 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 5 8.7 60 312 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC 8.6 45 673 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 8.5 60 588 Ft Continental ULTRACONTACT 8.5 60 917 Ft Bridgestone T005 8.4 Falken ZIEX ZE310EC 8.4 Bridgestone TURANZA 6 8.4 55 848 Ft Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 8.2 Nexen N'FERA PRIMUS 8.2 35 467 Ft Bridgestone T001evo 8.2 Toyo PROXES COMFORT 8.2 39 453 Ft Kleber DYNAXER HP4 8.2 45 590 Ft Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 2 8.2 41 435 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC+ 8.1 45 668 Ft Firestone ROADHAWK 8.1 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 8.1 68 749 Ft Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 8.1 Maxxis PREMITRA 5 HP5 8.1 Sava INTENSA HP 2 7.9 Bridgestone TURANZA ER300 7.9 54 658 Ft Laufenn LK01 S FIT EQ+ 7.9 31 413 Ft Debica PRESTO HP 2 7.9 Kumho KH31 ECSTA HM 7.7 38 680 Ft Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 7.6 36 651 Ft Continental CONTIPREMIUMCONTACT 2 7.5 Apollo ASPIRE 4G+ XL BSW 7.3 Cooper SUMMER 7.1 41 322 Ft Delinte DH2 XL 7.1 Kormoran ROAD PERFORMANCE 6.8 26 634 Ft Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3 6.7 39 426 Ft Goodride Z-107 ZuperEco MFS 6.7 30 749 Ft Radar RPX-800 6.5 Matador HECTORRA 5 6.2 34 468 Ft Leao NOVA-FORCE HP100 6.2 32 272 Ft Tracmax X PRIVILO TX-1 6.0 30 383 Ft Marshal MATRAC FX MU12 5.8 32 800 Ft Kormoran Gamma 5.6 Tourador X WONDER TH1 5.5 RoadX RX MOTION U11 XL BSW 5.2 25 559 Ft Nordexx NS9000 4.6 26 786 Ft Firemax FM601 XL 4.4 Taurus HIGH PERFORMANCE 4.2 31 232 Ft Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 3.6 46 232 Ft
3,6 medián 8,1 9,4
2. poradie v skupine z 50 porovnávaných
94 % pneumatík je slabších v tejto skupine
+0,9 nad mediánom skupiny medián skupiny 8,1
−0,4 na najlepšiu v skupine najlepšia má 9,4
Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (50)
  1. 1. 9.4 Falken ZIEX ZE320 43 959 Ft +12 998 Ft
  2. 2. 9.0 Kumho HS52 ECSTA Táto pneumatika 30 960 Ft
  3. 2. 9.0 Nokian Tyres WETPROOF 1 45 061 Ft +14 101 Ft
  4. 4. 8.9 Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 56 274 Ft +25 314 Ft
  5. 5. 8.8 Hankook K125 ventus Prime3
  6. 5. 8.8 Michelin PRIMACY 4 71 690 Ft +40 730 Ft
  7. 7. 8.7 Firestone ROADHAWK 2 41 821 Ft +10 861 Ft
  8. 7. 8.7 Michelin PRIMACY 5 60 312 Ft +29 352 Ft
  9. 9. 8.6 Vredestein ULTRAC 45 673 Ft +14 713 Ft
  10. 10. 8.5 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 60 588 Ft +29 628 Ft
  11. 10. 8.5 Continental ULTRACONTACT 60 917 Ft +29 957 Ft
  12. 12. 8.4 Bridgestone T005
  13. 12. 8.4 Falken ZIEX ZE310EC
  14. 12. 8.4 Bridgestone TURANZA 6 55 848 Ft +24 888 Ft
  15. 15. 8.2 Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2
  16. 15. 8.2 Nexen N'FERA PRIMUS 35 467 Ft +4 507 Ft
  17. 15. 8.2 Bridgestone T001evo
  18. 15. 8.2 Toyo PROXES COMFORT 39 453 Ft +8 492 Ft
  19. 15. 8.2 Kleber DYNAXER HP4 45 590 Ft +14 630 Ft
  20. 15. 8.2 Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 2 41 435 Ft +10 475 Ft
  21. 21. 8.1 Vredestein ULTRAC+ 45 668 Ft +14 708 Ft
  22. 21. 8.1 Firestone ROADHAWK
  23. 21. 8.1 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 68 749 Ft +37 789 Ft
  24. 21. 8.1 Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE
  25. 21. 8.1 Maxxis PREMITRA 5 HP5
  26. 26. 7.9 Sava INTENSA HP 2
  27. 26. 7.9 Bridgestone TURANZA ER300 54 658 Ft +23 698 Ft
  28. 26. 7.9 Laufenn LK01 S FIT EQ+ 31 413 Ft +453 Ft
  29. 26. 7.9 Debica PRESTO HP 2
  30. 30. 7.7 Kumho KH31 ECSTA HM 38 680 Ft +7 720 Ft
  31. 31. 7.6 Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 36 651 Ft +5 691 Ft
  32. 32. 7.5 Continental CONTIPREMIUMCONTACT 2
  33. 33. 7.3 Apollo ASPIRE 4G+ XL BSW
  34. 34. 7.1 Cooper SUMMER 41 322 Ft +10 362 Ft
  35. 34. 7.1 Delinte DH2 XL
  36. 36. 6.8 Kormoran ROAD PERFORMANCE 26 634 Ft −4 326 Ft
  37. 37. 6.7 Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3 39 426 Ft +8 466 Ft
  38. 37. 6.7 Goodride Z-107 ZuperEco MFS 30 749 Ft −211 Ft
  39. 39. 6.5 Radar RPX-800
  40. 40. 6.2 Matador HECTORRA 5 34 468 Ft +3 508 Ft
  41. 40. 6.2 Leao NOVA-FORCE HP100 32 272 Ft +1 312 Ft
  42. 42. 6.0 Tracmax X PRIVILO TX-1 30 383 Ft −577 Ft
  43. 43. 5.8 Marshal MATRAC FX MU12 32 800 Ft +1 840 Ft
  44. 44. 5.6 Kormoran Gamma
  45. 45. 5.5 Tourador X WONDER TH1
  46. 46. 5.2 RoadX RX MOTION U11 XL BSW 25 559 Ft −5 401 Ft
  47. 47. 4.6 Nordexx NS9000 26 786 Ft −4 174 Ft
  48. 48. 4.4 Firemax FM601 XL
  49. 49. 4.2 Taurus HIGH PERFORMANCE 31 232 Ft +272 Ft
  50. 50. 3.6 Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 46 232 Ft +15 272 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

30 960 Ft ÷ 40 346 km × 100
77 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 225/55 R16 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho ECSTA HS52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 225/55 R16
Width225 mm
Profile height55 %
Rim diameter16″
Load index (LI)95
Speed index (SI)W
Product code2304623
EAN8808956318758
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripA NoiseB (71 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread ECSTA HS52
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 29.12.2023
Product launch date (gen.) 02.07.2023
Available technologies

No technologies are listed for this size.

Comparison

Konkurencia

Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho ECSTA HS52.
Compare →
Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE
Bf goodrich
ADVANTAGE
8.1
This tyre
Kumho ECSTA HS52
Kumho
ECSTA HS52
from 30 960 Ft
Reference tyre
Compare →
Kumho HS51 ECSTA
Kumho
HS51 ECSTA
7.9
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 4×
Wins 0×
Top 3 1×
Average placement 6,3
2026
9. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/50 R17 2026
16 tyres
Detail →
2024
5. place
Auto Bild Test letných pneumatík 205/55 R16 2024
20 tyres
Detail →
3. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 215/55 R17 2024
16 tyres
Detail →
2023
8. place
Tyrereviews Summer Tire Test 205/55 R16 2023
13 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 225/55 R16.

Current lowest
30 960,06 Ft
↗ 36 630,41 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
75,98 Ft
20.7.2026
Highest for the period
30 960,06 Ft
24.9.2026
30 960,06 75,98 30 960,06 Ft 22.6.2026 24.9.2026 22.6.2026: 84,29 Ft 20.7.2026: 75,98 Ft 21.9.2026: 77,09 Ft 24.9.2026: 30 960,06 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,0
★★★★☆
z 21 recenzií
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
40 346 km
Reliability:confidence-high
RO
ro***@abv.bg
Skoda Octavia · 195/65 R15 · 563 km
★★★★★

Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tyre feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tyre really).
First impressions are that this tyre is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tyre is incredible.

EL
el***@web.de
Skoda octavia estate 4x4 · 225/45 R17 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.
As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.

F.
f.***@hotmail.com
Honda Civic Diesel · 215/50 R17 · 24 140 km
★★★★☆

I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I'm extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it's not catastrophic, but it slips where I don't have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the "tests" ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn't bother me.
It's better than Chinese, but I wouldn't buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it's raining, even when I think I'm going slowly enough, I don't like it.

ER
er***@hotmail.com
Volkswagen Passat B7 · 235/45 R17 · 25 750 km
★★★☆☆

This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles

ED
ed***@gmail.com
Suzuki Swift · 185/55 R16
★☆☆☆☆

:)

Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?

Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.

Sign in