20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

WINTERCRAFT WP52+

8.4
PTI – Pneutesty Index
very good ✓ 3 tyre tests
PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 255/45 R20 among 38 available
tested only in R15, R17, R18 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Price from
71 667 Ft
in 255/45 R20
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For winter (3PMSF) tyres, the SI may be either higher or lower than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 255/45 R20 Speed / Load: 105V XL
Rolling resistanceB Wet gripA NoiseB Price from 71 667 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile 3PMSF 3PMSF Suitable for EVs Suitable for EVs
View prices →
Rating and verdict

How the WinterCraft WP52 plus evaluated

8.4
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,4 / 10 · very good PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 255/45 R20 among 38 available
tested only in R15, R17, R18 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Snow 83
+3 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 82
+4 % 2 Tests
snow traction 83
+3 % 2 Tests
snow handling 95
+3 % 1 test
Wet 82
+2 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 93
+10 % 2 Tests
Aquaplaning 67
−1 % 2 Tests
wet handling 89
+3 % 1 test
Dry 78
+2 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 94
+4 % 3 Tests
dry handling 23
≈ average 1 test
Ice –
Not measured. 1 test 1 test
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking 61
+1 % 1 test
Economy 62
+6 % 3 Tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 35
−1 % 3 Tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 65
+9 % 3 Tests
Noise and comfort 1
≈ average 2 Tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 32
≈ average 2 Tests
ride comfort 2
‹
Not measured. –
Where it is strong
Snowbetter than 83 %
Wetbetter than 82 %
Drybetter than 78 %
Where it falls behind
Noise and comfortworse than 99 % · ≈ ako priemer
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 Top 3 1× 1st–3rd place in 1 tests counted in PTI

Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure
3PMSF
3PMSF Certified for winter conditions
Suitable for EVs
Suitable for EVs Reinforced for EV weight and torque

Where Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ stands in size 255/45 R20

Compared with 22 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 8,4 71 667 Ft
Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P 9.1 82 174 Ft Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 9.1 89 135 Ft Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 8.7 146 183 Ft Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV 8.6 77 814 Ft Dunlop WINTER 8.6 88 193 Ft Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 8.4 71 667 Ft This tyre Kleber KRISALP HP3 SUV 8.1 67 285 Ft Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 7.9 77 934 Ft Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 7.8 76 699 Ft Barum POLARIS 6 7.7 70 529 Ft Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 7.6 66 319 Ft Toyo OBSERVE EWS1 7.6 60 118 Ft Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 7.5 75 071 Ft Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 7.4 67 690 Ft Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV SILENTDRIVE 7.3 81 387 Ft Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 3 7.3 95 174 Ft Michelin LATITUDE ALPIN LA2 7.1 Radar DIMAX WINTER 6.8 60 907 Ft Toyo S954 SNOWPROX SUV 6.7 90 600 Ft Triangle EFFEXWINTER TW421 6.5 36 991 Ft Imperial SnowDragon UHP 5.6 40 658 Ft Zeetex WH1000 4.6 48 520 Ft
4,6 median 7,6 9,1
6. rank in the group of 22 compared
73 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+0,8 above the group median group median 7,6
−0,7 behind the best in the group the best has 9,1
Show all tyres in the ranking (22)
  1. 1. 9.1 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 3P 82 174 Ft +10 507 Ft
  2. 1. 9.1 Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 89 135 Ft +17 468 Ft
  3. 3. 8.7 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 146 183 Ft +74 516 Ft
  4. 4. 8.6 Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV 77 814 Ft +6 147 Ft
  5. 4. 8.6 Dunlop WINTER 88 193 Ft +16 526 Ft
  6. 6. 8.4 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ This tyre 71 667 Ft
  7. 7. 8.1 Kleber KRISALP HP3 SUV 67 285 Ft −4 382 Ft
  8. 8. 7.9 Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 77 934 Ft +6 266 Ft
  9. 9. 7.8 Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 76 699 Ft +5 032 Ft
  10. 10. 7.7 Barum POLARIS 6 70 529 Ft −1 138 Ft
  11. 11. 7.6 Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 66 319 Ft −5 348 Ft
  12. 11. 7.6 Toyo OBSERVE EWS1 60 118 Ft −11 549 Ft
  13. 13. 7.5 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 75 071 Ft +3 404 Ft
  14. 14. 7.4 Cooper DISCOVERER WINTER 67 690 Ft −3 977 Ft
  15. 15. 7.3 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV SILENTDRIVE 81 387 Ft +9 720 Ft
  16. 15. 7.3 Pirelli SCORPION WINTER 3 95 174 Ft +23 507 Ft
  17. 17. 7.1 Michelin LATITUDE ALPIN LA2
  18. 18. 6.8 Radar DIMAX WINTER 60 907 Ft −10 760 Ft
  19. 19. 6.7 Toyo S954 SNOWPROX SUV 90 600 Ft +18 933 Ft
  20. 20. 6.5 Triangle EFFEXWINTER TW421 36 991 Ft −34 676 Ft
  21. 21. 5.6 Imperial SnowDragon UHP 40 658 Ft −31 009 Ft
  22. 22. 4.6 Zeetex WH1000 48 520 Ft −23 147 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

71 667 Ft ÷ 41 114 km × 100
174 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 255/45 R20 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Kleber KRISALP HP3 SUV 143 Ft
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 174 Ft

Kleber KRISALP HP3 SUV works out cheaper per 100 km, but has a lower overall score (8,1 vs 8,4).

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 255/45 R20
Width255 mm
Profile height45 %
Rim diameter20″
Load index (LI)105
Speed index (SI)V
Product code2371803
EAN8808956617479
EU energy label Rolling resistanceB Wet gripA NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread WINTERCRAFT WP52+
Season Winter
Vehicle type SUV / 4×4
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 17.07.2025
Product launch date (gen.) 29.08.2025
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
3PMSF 3PMSF Áno
Vhodné pre elektro Áno - EV READY
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 1×
Wins 0×
Top 3 0×
Average placement 12,0
2026
12. place
ADAC Winter Tyre Test 185/65 R15 2026
16 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 255/45 R20.

Current lowest
71 667,06 Ft
↗ 41 958,13 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
157,23 Ft
24.9.2026
Highest for the period
71 667,06 Ft
14.10.2026
71 667,06 157,23 71 667,06 Ft 17.7.2026 14.10.2026 17.7.2026: 170,40 Ft 17.7.2026: 168,51 Ft 18.7.2026: 167,90 Ft 21.7.2026: 168,14 Ft 22.7.2026: 168,48 Ft 23.7.2026: 168,39 Ft 24.7.2026: 168,37 Ft 25.7.2026: 168,53 Ft 28.7.2026: 168,98 Ft 30.7.2026: 168,58 Ft 30.7.2026: 168,51 Ft 31.7.2026: 169,15 Ft 31.7.2026: 171,74 Ft 31.7.2026: 172,00 Ft 1.8.2026: 172,55 Ft 1.8.2026: 177,16 Ft 3.8.2026: 178,36 Ft 4.8.2026: 178,79 Ft 5.8.2026: 178,40 Ft 5.8.2026: 174,17 Ft 5.8.2026: 167,52 Ft 8.8.2026: 167,11 Ft 12.8.2026: 165,60 Ft 14.8.2026: 166,64 Ft 19.8.2026: 167,04 Ft 20.8.2026: 164,91 Ft 21.8.2026: 165,51 Ft 22.8.2026: 165,91 Ft 28.8.2026: 165,51 Ft 1.9.2026: 165,31 Ft 2.9.2026: 164,40 Ft 4.9.2026: 164,00 Ft 11.9.2026: 163,83 Ft 17.9.2026: 160,31 Ft 21.9.2026: 163,39 Ft 24.9.2026: 157,23 Ft 7.10.2026: 173,19 Ft 7.10.2026: 176,69 Ft 8.10.2026: 180,19 Ft 9.10.2026: 170,18 Ft 9.10.2026: 173,51 Ft 10.10.2026: 172,61 Ft 10.10.2026: 168,50 Ft 10.10.2026: 178,28 Ft 10.10.2026: 180,19 Ft 13.10.2026: 185,51 Ft 14.10.2026: 71 667,06 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

4,2
★★★★☆
from 5 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
41 114 km
Reliability:confidence-high
MA
ma***@interia.pl
Audi A3 Sportback · 225/45 R17 · 4 268 km
★★★★☆

I have to buy a new tyre because Hankook Winter i*recept rs3 had the quality issues.. Hankook generates vibration and radial runout.. After very positive reviews and test results I decide to buy Kumho Wintercraft WP52+ in the size 225 45 r17.
I made one season on this tyres and had opportunity to test this tyres in each conditions, because this year winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet. Quieter than my Sommer Falken Fk520...
The grip on the dry and wet I great, the tyres are very comfortable. And the quaility of the tyre is great. Because of the bad experience with falken and Hankook. I decided to check the tyre on Hunter road force test. And the results were impressing. 25N,10N,5N!. One tyre was worse because have rubber rissees form production and has 85 N... But I got information that this rubber rissees will go out after the driving and it was true.
I am very satisfied with this tyres. I forgot to mention about snow and ice grip and it was very good. On the ice usually only the studs help, but during this winter I don't have any issues with grip and handling. Well done Kumho.
I didn't evaluate the grip because it is the first season and I didn't make as many km as usually.
Poprawiona i bardziej naturalna wersja po angielsku:
I had to buy new tyres because the Hankook Winter i*cept RS3 had quality issues. The Hankooks generated vibrations and had radial runout problems. After reading many positive reviews and test results, I decided to buy the Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ in size 225/45 R17.
I used these tyres for one season and had the opportunity to test them in all conditions, because this winter in Poland was very snowy and cold. The tyres are very quiet - even quieter than my summer Falken FK520 tyres.
The grip on dry and wet roads is great, and the tyres are very comfortable. The build quality is also excellent. Because of my bad experiences with Falken and Hankook, I decided to check the tyres using a Hunter Road Force test, and the results were impressive: 25 N, 10 N, and 5 N. One tyre performed worse because it had rubber residues from production and showed 85 N, but I was informed that the issue would disappear after some driving - and it did.
I am very satisfied with these tyres. I almost forgot to mention the snow and ice performance, which was also very good. On ice, usually only studded tyres provide perfect grip, but during this winter I had no issues with traction or handling. Well done, Kumho.
I didn’t evaluate tread wear yet because this was only the first season and I haven’t driven as many kilometres as usual.

17
17***@noreg.com
Volvo V60 T6 AWD · 235/45 R17 · 8 047 km
★★★★☆

Great tyres for the cost, transforms car in winter with great grip, water shedding and ride comfort

CO
co***@geekoland.fr
MG HS · 225/55 R19 · 8 047 km
★★★★★

Comparing the brands like Continental, Bridgestone, Hankook, Michelin, we are very impressed by the progression of Kumho. The wp52+ tested in France in the Vosges and in the city is impressive. Tire and report quality price incomparable.

VA
va***@gmail.com
BMW 530i · 245/45 R18 · 1 609 km
★★★★☆

Mounted these this season on my BMW 530i xDrive, and after a few hundred kilometers of mixed driving, including mountain roads with tight hairpins, wet tarmac, and temperatures between 3–5°C, I’m genuinely impressed. With all driver aids turned off, the grip was annoyingly good; no matter how much I tried to unsettle the car, it simply stuck to the road.
Coming from Continental run-flats, the comfort improvement is immediately noticeable. The ride feels more compliant, and surprisingly, the road noise is minimal barely distinguishable from my summer Michelin Primacy 3s. That was an unexpected bonus.
As for fuel consumption, I can’t make a direct comparison since my winter setup is 245/45 R18 all around, while summer is 245 front / 275 rear on 19-inch wheels. Still, the overall consumption seems similar.
So far, the WP52+ have been flawless in all conditions tested wet grip, handling, comfort, and noise are top-notch. I’ll post an update once I’ve had the chance to test them on snow and ice, but as it stands, Kumho really nailed it with this tire.

IV
iv***@gmail.com
BMW 320d touring · 205/55 R16 · 3 219 km
★★★★☆

Best deal ever!
Tyres are premium feel, Class A wet grip, drive like a german tyre on a BMW Touring 320D. Made in Korea.
The only other Class A wet grip tyre is Bridgestone, with $55 more per tyre.
Kumho is the top-brand of the corporation, the budget version is Marshall.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in