20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 470 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

WINTERCRAFT WP52

8.0
PTI – Pneutesty Index
very good ✓ 9 tyre tests
PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/65 R17 among 33 available
tested in R17 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured
Price from
63 485 Ft
in 225/65 R17
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
2
ProfileAspect ratio (%)
3
Rim diameterin inches
4
Load capacityLI index

Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.

5
SpeedSI index

Speed index (SI) — For winter (3PMSF) tyres, the SI may be either higher or lower than stated in the vehicle registration document.

Your size 225/65 R17 Speed / Load: 106H XL
Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB Price from 63 485 Ft
Reinforced profile Reinforced profile M+S M+S 3PMSF 3PMSF
View prices →
Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Current prices for size 225/65 R17.

Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.

Rating and verdict

How the Winter Craft WP52 evaluated

8.0
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,0 / 10 · very good PTI compared with all winter tyres · rank in size 225/65 R17 among 33 available
tested in R17 noise and comfort: only 65 % measured ranking not certain yet (7.–18.)
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Snow 27
≈ average 11 tests
what it consists of Snow (3)
snow braking 32
≈ average 9 tests
snow traction 27
≈ average 6 tests
snow handling 54
≈ average 5 tests
Wet 70
+2 % 11 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 82
+6 % 9 tests
Aquaplaning 16
−6 % 6 tests
wet handling 61
≈ average 5 tests
Dry 94
+3 % 6 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 95
+4 % 6 tests
dry handling 84
≈ average 4 Tests
Ice –
Not measured. 2 Tests
what it consists of Ice (1)
ice braking 72
+2 % 2 Tests
Economy 49
+3 % 7 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 7
−3 % 5 tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 62
+7 % 4 Tests
Noise and comfort 42
≈ average 5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 63
≈ average 4 Tests
ride comfort 13
Not measured. –
Where it is strong
Drybetter than 94 %
Where it falls behind
Aquaplaning−6 %

Zákaznícke recenzie do PTI nevstupujú – PTI stojí na meraniach nezávislých testov; pri pneumatikách s málo testami čiastočne prihliada aj na triedu značky.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway
Reinforced profile
Reinforced profile Higher load capacity at higher pressure
M+S
M+S Suitable for mud and snow
3PMSF
3PMSF Certified for winter conditions

Where Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 stands in size 225/65 R17

Compared with 23 tyres in this size — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 8,0 63 485 Ft
Pirelli CINTURATO WINTER 3 9.7 72 233 Ft Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 9.1 68 022 Ft Michelin ALPIN 7 8.9 75 008 Ft Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X 8.7 51 382 Ft better and cheaper Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV 8.6 54 195 Ft better and cheaper Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 8.4 44 111 Ft better and cheaper Kleber KRISALP HP3 SUV 8.1 48 523 Ft better and cheaper Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 8.0 63 485 Ft This tyre Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 7.9 54 555 Ft Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 7.8 54 906 Ft Barum POLARIS 6 7.7 47 100 Ft Toyo OBSERVE EWS1 7.6 45 260 Ft Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 7.6 47 186 Ft Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 7.5 47 859 Ft Laufenn LW31 i FIT 7.4 38 688 Ft Apollo ASPIRE XP WINTER 7.4 49 659 Ft Toyo S944 OBSERVE 7.3 49 679 Ft Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV 7.3 54 126 Ft Radar DIMAX WINTER 6.8 43 909 Ft Matador MP93 NORDICCA 6.6 42 621 Ft Maxxis PREMITRA SNOW WP6 SUV 6.6 43 922 Ft Triangle TW401 WinterX 6.5 31 091 Ft Zeetex WH1000 SUV 4.6 35 753 Ft
4,6 median 7,6 9,7
8. rank in the group of 23 compared
65 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+0,4 above the group median group median 7,6
−1,7 behind the best in the group the best has 9,7
Show all tyres in the ranking (23)
  1. 1. 9.7 Pirelli CINTURATO WINTER 3 72 233 Ft +8 748 Ft
  2. 2. 9.1 Bridgestone BLIZZAK 6 68 022 Ft +4 538 Ft
  3. 3. 8.9 Michelin ALPIN 7 75 008 Ft +11 523 Ft
  4. 4. 8.7 Hankook W330A WINTER I*CEPT EVO3 X better and cheaper 51 382 Ft −12 103 Ft
  5. 5. 8.6 Hankook W340A WINTER I*CEPT EVO 4 SUV better and cheaper 54 195 Ft −9 290 Ft
  6. 6. 8.4 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ better and cheaper 44 111 Ft −19 374 Ft
  7. 7. 8.1 Kleber KRISALP HP3 SUV better and cheaper 48 523 Ft −14 962 Ft
  8. 8. 8.0 Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 This tyre 63 485 Ft
  9. 9. 7.9 Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 54 555 Ft −8 929 Ft
  10. 10. 7.8 Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 54 906 Ft −8 579 Ft
  11. 11. 7.7 Barum POLARIS 6 47 100 Ft −16 384 Ft
  12. 12. 7.6 Toyo OBSERVE EWS1 45 260 Ft −18 224 Ft
  13. 12. 7.6 Firestone WINTERHAWK 4 47 186 Ft −16 299 Ft
  14. 14. 7.5 Falken EUROWINTER HS02PRO 47 859 Ft −15 626 Ft
  15. 15. 7.4 Laufenn LW31 i FIT 38 688 Ft −24 797 Ft
  16. 15. 7.4 Apollo ASPIRE XP WINTER 49 659 Ft −13 826 Ft
  17. 17. 7.3 Toyo S944 OBSERVE 49 679 Ft −13 806 Ft
  18. 17. 7.3 Nokian Tyres SNOWPROOF 2 SUV 54 126 Ft −9 359 Ft
  19. 19. 6.8 Radar DIMAX WINTER 43 909 Ft −19 576 Ft
  20. 20. 6.6 Matador MP93 NORDICCA 42 621 Ft −20 864 Ft
  21. 20. 6.6 Maxxis PREMITRA SNOW WP6 SUV 43 922 Ft −19 563 Ft
  22. 22. 6.5 Triangle TW401 WinterX 31 091 Ft −32 394 Ft
  23. 23. 4.6 Zeetex WH1000 SUV 35 753 Ft −27 732 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

63 485 Ft ÷ 47 290 km × 100
134 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 225/65 R17 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Apollo ASPIRE XP WINTER 107 Ft
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 134 Ft

Apollo ASPIRE XP WINTER works out cheaper per 100 km, but has a lower overall score (7,4 vs 8,0).

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Selected size 225/65 R17
Width225 mm
Profile height65 %
Rim diameter17″
Load index (LI)106
Speed index (SI)H
Product code2311103
EAN8808956326173
EU energy label Rolling resistanceC Wet gripB NoiseB (72 dB)
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread WINTERCRAFT WP52
Season Winter
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 24.05.2022
Product launch date (gen.) 15.06.2023
Available technologies
Zosilený profil Áno
M+S Áno - M+S
3PMSF 3PMSF Áno
Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52.
New

Successor to the model you are viewing

The tyre you are viewing already has a successor. We recommend choosing the more advanced model:

Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 7×
Wins 0×
Top 3 0×
Average placement 9,1
2025
4. place
Auto Bild large winter tire braking test 225/40 R18 2025
52 tyres
Detail →
2024
12. place
ADAC Winter Tire Test 215/55 R17 2024
16 tyres
Detail →
15. place
AutoBild Winter Tire Test 205/55 R16 2024
20 tyres
Detail →
7. place
AutoBild Winter Tire Test 245/45 R18 2024
12 tyres
Detail →
2023
9. place
Tyre Reviews Winter Tire Test 225/45 R18 2023
13 tyres
Detail →
8. place
AutoBild Winter tire test for sports cars 225/40 R18 2023
11 tyres
Detail →
9. place
ADAC Winter Tire Test 225/45 R17 2023
15 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Lowest price across shops for size 225/65 R17.

Current lowest
63 484,66 Ft
↗ 31 404,47 % more expensive
Lowest for the period
131,69 Ft
8.9.2026
Highest for the period
63 484,66 Ft
14.10.2026
63 484,66 131,69 63 484,66 Ft 22.6.2026 14.10.2026 22.6.2026: 201,51 Ft 22.6.2026: 229,37 Ft 22.6.2026: 201,51 Ft 23.6.2026: 252,16 Ft 23.6.2026: 201,51 Ft 24.6.2026: 252,16 Ft 24.6.2026: 201,51 Ft 25.6.2026: 252,16 Ft 25.6.2026: 201,51 Ft 17.7.2026: 199,85 Ft 18.7.2026: 201,51 Ft 29.7.2026: 134,47 Ft 29.7.2026: 134,16 Ft 31.7.2026: 134,47 Ft 1.8.2026: 134,16 Ft 8.8.2026: 133,86 Ft 14.8.2026: 134,16 Ft 19.8.2026: 134,47 Ft 20.8.2026: 138,81 Ft 21.8.2026: 134,47 Ft 21.8.2026: 135,17 Ft 22.8.2026: 135,47 Ft 28.8.2026: 135,17 Ft 1.9.2026: 135,47 Ft 2.9.2026: 135,17 Ft 4.9.2026: 134,86 Ft 8.9.2026: 187,48 Ft 8.9.2026: 131,69 Ft 12.10.2026: 137,59 Ft 14.10.2026: 63 484,66 Ft

The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.

User reviews

What owners say

3,7
★★★★☆
from 6 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
47 290 km
Reliability:confidence-high
IV
iv***@hotmail.com
Volkswagen Golf mk5 · 205/55 R16 · 28 968 km
★★★★☆

Very good tyre for snow. Good at dry and wet cornering. Not good at wet braking, distance of braking is longer but tyre is good for controlling that distance if you put breaking pad harder when you got to lower speed it will not slide in tricky situations.

XK
xk***@gmail.com
Audi A4 1.8T Quattro · 225/50 R17 · 8 047 km
★★★★☆

Fitted these tyres late 2023. The price was good and the reviews were OK. After one very mild winter I can say that these tyres are not perfect but they don't disappoint.
Dry grip is good, wet grip is also ok. Under braking the car is predictable and stable. Didn't experience any aquaplanning at all.
They're very resistant to wear, after about 8000km they appear good as new, but time will tell how long they last.
Grip on snow is mediocre but combined with the AWD the car managed everything I threw at it, from 20cm of fresh snow to awfully wet sludge on a dirt road, they got me through.
They're very comfortable over potholes, a bit noisy but that's expected from an aggressive tyre pattern, they're structurally strong although a bit heavy (tyre fitter told me it's the heaviest he had at that size) and they increased fuel consumption slightly. They're not sporty but they're not meant to be, so I won't be commenting on that.
The Pirelli Sottozero 3 I had before were a bit better in every way but the price on the Kumho's makes them worth it.

AR
ar***@gmail.com
Tesla Model 3 LR · 225/45 R18 · 40 234 km
★★★☆☆

25,000km already done with these wp52s, they are generally good but a slight feeling of vagueness in terms of grip in the wet, in the dry you can feel the tires working in the turns, always this feeling a little vague. On the snow the traction is good, it does the job.
The tires consume a little more than summer tires, and they are of course a little noisier.
But the price-performance ratio is very good compared to the competition, for cheap it does the job without being exceptional.

JQ
jq***@wp.pl
Hyundai elantra · 225/45 R17 · 12 875 km
★★★☆☆

Good dry handling and traction, average wet and below expectations on snow as for a winter tyre.
Noise depends a lot on tyre pressure

ES
es***@gmail.com
Audi A3 Sportback · 205/55 R16 · 4 828 km
★★★★☆

I have WP52 on my A3 Sportback. Very good tyre, excellent grip on snow, and dry roads, satisfy grip on wet road.

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in