Kumho Mid-range WINTERCRAFT WP52
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
We currently don't have a variant for the selected combination.
Price comparison across shops
Vo vašom rozmere 165/70 R14 túto pneumatiku momentálne nepredáva ani jeden zo sledovaných e-shopov.
Nevadí — pozrite si priame alternatívy medzi konkurenciou alebo to, ako pneumatika obstála v testoch.
How the Winter Craft WP52 evaluated
Skóre vychádza z 11 nezávislých testov a z 8 recenzií vodičov. ?
The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.
Dry top tier 98,9 Wet average 91,8 Value weaker 87,5 Snow good 94 
Kde stojí Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 v rozmere 165/70 R14
Porovnané s 28 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna aj zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.
Goodyear ULTRAGRIP 9+ 9.5 28 829 Ft 
Hankook W462 WINTER I*CEPT RS3 9.0 23 651 Ft 
Semperit SPEED-GRIP 5 8.7 22 924 Ft 
Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52+ 8.5 19 566 Ft 
Dunlop WINTER RESPONSE 2 8.5 26 500 Ft 
Barum POLARIS 6 8.3 20 425 Ft 
Falken EUROWINTER HS02 8.3 22 680 Ft 
Apollo ALNAC 4G WINTER 8.3 21 402 Ft Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 8.2 Táto pneumatika 
Laufenn LW31 I FIT+ 8.2 18 144 Ft 
Uniroyal WINTEREXPERT 8.1 23 489 Ft 
Matador MP93 NORDICCA 8.1 18 673 Ft 
Nexen WINGUARD SNOW'G 3 7.9 20 122 Ft 
Vredestein SNOWTRAC 5 7.8 21 985 Ft 
Radar DIMAX WINTER 7.8 24 829 Ft 
Platin RP-70 WINTER 7.3 26 938 Ft 
Nexen WINGUARD SNOW'G WH2 7.2 22 407 Ft 
Riken SNOWTIME B2 6.9 25 197 Ft 
Fulda KRISTALL MONTERO 3 MS 6.6 19 637 Ft 
Tracmax X-PRIVILO S-130 6.4 16 499 Ft 
Taurus 601 WINTER 6.4 25 075 Ft 
Nankang SV-3 6.3 18 331 Ft 
Sava ESKIMO S3+ MS 6.3 19 474 Ft 
Sailun ICE BLAZER ALPINE+ (WSL3+) 6.1 16 711 Ft 
Imperial SnowDragon HP 5.9 21 073 Ft 
Debica FRIGO 2 MS 5.8 21 471 Ft 
West lake SW608 SNOWMASTER 4.5 23 592 Ft 
Goodride SW608 M+S 2.8 24 370 Ft Goodride SW608 M+S 24 370 Ft 9.5 najlepšia v skupine Goodyear ULTRAGRIP 9+ 28 829 Ft Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (28)
- 1. 9.5 28 829 Ft
- 2. 9.0 23 651 Ft
- 3. 8.7 22 924 Ft
- 4. 8.5 19 566 Ft
- 4. 8.5 26 500 Ft
- 6. 8.3 20 425 Ft
- 6. 8.3 22 680 Ft
- 6. 8.3 21 402 Ft
- 9. 8.2
- 9. 8.2 18 144 Ft
- 11. 8.1 23 489 Ft
- 11. 8.1 18 673 Ft
- 13. 7.9 20 122 Ft
- 14. 7.8 21 985 Ft
- 14. 7.8 24 829 Ft
- 16. 7.3 26 938 Ft
- 17. 7.2 22 407 Ft
- 18. 6.9 25 197 Ft
- 19. 6.6 19 637 Ft
- 20. 6.4 16 499 Ft
- 20. 6.4 25 075 Ft
- 22. 6.3 18 331 Ft
- 22. 6.3 19 474 Ft
- 24. 6.1 16 711 Ft
- 25. 5.9 21 073 Ft
- 26. 5.8 21 471 Ft
- 27. 4.5 23 592 Ft
- 28. 2.8 24 370 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 165/70 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Technical information
Focus: Standard
The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho WINTERCRAFT WP52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.
D 
B 
B (71 dB) 
3PMSF Áno Konkurencia
Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.
Which tests it appeared in
0× 0× 
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 165/70 R14.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
Very good tyre for snow. Good at dry and wet cornering. Not good at wet braking, distance of braking is longer but tyre is good for controlling that distance if you put breaking pad harder when you got to lower speed it will not slide in tricky situations.
Fitted these tyres late 2023. The price was good and the reviews were OK. After one very mild winter I can say that these tyres are not perfect but they don't disappoint.
Dry grip is good, wet grip is also ok. Under braking the car is predictable and stable. Didn't experience any aquaplanning at all.
They're very resistant to wear, after about 8000km they appear good as new, but time will tell how long they last.
Grip on snow is mediocre but combined with the AWD the car managed everything I threw at it, from 20cm of fresh snow to awfully wet sludge on a dirt road, they got me through.
They're very comfortable over potholes, a bit noisy but that's expected from an aggressive tyre pattern, they're structurally strong although a bit heavy (tyre fitter told me it's the heaviest he had at that size) and they increased fuel consumption slightly. They're not sporty but they're not meant to be, so I won't be commenting on that.
The Pirelli Sottozero 3 I had before were a bit better in every way but the price on the Kumho's makes them worth it.
25,000km already done with these wp52s, they are generally good but a slight feeling of vagueness in terms of grip in the wet, in the dry you can feel the tires working in the turns, always this feeling a little vague. On the snow the traction is good, it does the job.
The tires consume a little more than summer tires, and they are of course a little noisier.
But the price-performance ratio is very good compared to the competition, for cheap it does the job without being exceptional.
Good dry handling and traction, average wet and below expectations on snow as for a winter tyre.
Noise depends a lot on tyre pressure
I have WP52 on my A3 Sportback. Very good tyre, excellent grip on snow, and dry roads, satisfy grip on wet road.
Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?
Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.
Sign in