Kumho Mid-range ECSTA HS52
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
Load index (LI) — You must keep the LI at least as high as stated in the vehicle registration document for the specific tyre size. A higher LI (load index) is permitted by law.
Speed index (SI) — For summer tyres, the SI may be higher than stated in the vehicle registration document.
Price comparison across shops
Current prices for size 185/60 R14.
Prices are indicative and may differ in the shop. Click to go straight to the product.
How the Ecsta HS52 evaluated
Skóre vychádza z 8 nezávislých testov a z 22 recenzií vodičov. ?
The number shows what percentage of the best tyre’s performance in the test this tyre achieved in this discipline.
Kde stojí Kumho HS52 ECSTA v rozmere 185/60 R14
Porovnané s 22 pneumatikami v tomto rozmere — rovnaká sezóna aj zameranie. Všetky sú v ponuke a majú výsledky z nezávislých testov.
Kumho HS52 ECSTA 9.0 20 447 Ft Táto pneumatika
Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 8.5 34 384 Ft
Continental ULTRACONTACT 8.5 32 847 Ft
Nokian Tyres iLine 8.2
Toyo PROXES COMFORT BSW 8.2 20 952 Ft
Kleber DYNAXER HP4 DT1 8.2
Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 8.1 29 955 Ft
Nexen N'BLUE S 8.1 21 308 Ft
Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 7.7 24 713 Ft
Falken SINCERA SN110 7.7 23 886 Ft
Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 7.6 20 048 Ft
Uniroyal RAINEXPERT 5 7.5 26 224 Ft
Cooper SUMMER 7.1 21 906 Ft
Matador MP47 HECTORRA 3 6.7
RoadX RXMOTION H11 6.5 16 349 Ft
Firestone MULTIHAWK 2 6.5 23 752 Ft
Radar RPX800 6.5
Matador HECTORRA 5 6.2 20 612 Ft
Petlas IMPERIUM PT-515 6.2 23 715 Ft
Sava PERFECTA 5.8 24 621 Ft
Fortuna ECOPLUS HP 4.9 24 644 Ft
Arivo PREMIO ARZERO 3.6 24 528 Ft Zobraziť všetky pneumatiky v rebríčku (22)
- 1. 9.0 20 447 Ft
- 2. 8.5 34 384 Ft +13 937 Ft
- 2. 8.5 32 847 Ft +12 400 Ft
- 4. 8.2
- 4. 8.2 20 952 Ft +505 Ft
- 4. 8.2
- 7. 8.1 29 955 Ft +9 508 Ft
- 7. 8.1 21 308 Ft +861 Ft
- 9. 7.7 24 713 Ft +4 266 Ft
- 9. 7.7 23 886 Ft +3 439 Ft
- 11. 7.6 20 048 Ft −399 Ft
- 12. 7.5 26 224 Ft +5 777 Ft
- 13. 7.1 21 906 Ft +1 459 Ft
- 14. 6.7
- 15. 6.5 16 349 Ft −4 098 Ft
- 15. 6.5 23 752 Ft +3 305 Ft
- 15. 6.5
- 18. 6.2 20 612 Ft +165 Ft
- 18. 6.2 23 715 Ft +3 268 Ft
- 20. 5.8 24 621 Ft +4 174 Ft
- 21. 4.9 24 644 Ft +4 197 Ft
- 22. 3.6 24 528 Ft +4 081 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 185/60 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Spomedzi porovnávaných má Kumho ECSTA HS52 najnižšiu cenu na 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Standard
The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho ECSTA HS52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.
No technologies are listed for this size.
Konkurencia
Hlavní konkurenti v rovnakej cenovej kategórii.
Which tests it appeared in
How the price has evolved
Lowest price across shops for size 185/60 R14.
The lowest available price across the monitored shops is shown. Indicative; may differ in the shop.
What owners say
Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tyre feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tyre really).
First impressions are that this tyre is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tyre is incredible.
I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.
As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.
I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I'm extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it's not catastrophic, but it slips where I don't have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the "tests" ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn't bother me.
It's better than Chinese, but I wouldn't buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it's raining, even when I think I'm going slowly enough, I don't like it.
This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles
:)
Jazdíte na týchto pneumatikách?
Prihláste sa a napíšte recenziu — pomôžete ostatným pri výbere.
Sign in