20 000+ reviews 4 600+ tyres 140+ tests 480 000+ prices tracked
Standard
Kumho Mid-range

ECSTA HS52

8.2
PTI – Pneutesty Index
very good ✓ 6 tyre tests
compared with 257 summer tyres
Price from
20 845 Ft
in 185/60 R14
Choose your size

Which sizes it's made in

Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.

1
Widthin millimetres
↑

For a more accurate search, please enter your size — select the width, profile and rim diameter above.

Where to buy

Price comparison across shops

Select a size and we'll compare prices across shops.

Rating and verdict

How the Ecsta HS52 evaluated

8.2
PTI – Pneutesty Index 8,2 / 10 · very good compared with 257 summer tyres
Discipline Percentile worsegroup averagebest Gap ⓘ Tests
Wet 83
+6 % 8 tests
what it consists of Wet (3)
wet braking 94
+10 % 6 tests
Aquaplaning 17
−2 % 6 tests
wet handling 65
+1 % 3 Tests
Dry 90
+3 % 8 tests
what it consists of Dry (2)
dry braking 90
+4 % 6 tests
dry handling 86
≈ average 3 Tests
Economy 73
+9 % 6 tests
what it consists of Economy (2)
efficiency (rolling resistance and consumption) 13
−1 % 6 tests
durability (wear and abrasion) 80
+13 % 5 tests
Noise and comfort 35
≈ average 5 tests
what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
quietness (measured and subjective noise) 50
≈ average 5 tests
ride comfort 4
Not measured. –
Where it is strong
Wetbetter than 83 %
Drybetter than 90 %
Where it falls behind
no notable weakness
🏆 Trophies from our data
🏆 Top 3 2× 1st–3rd place in 2 tests counted in PTI

Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based solely on measurements from independent tests.

✓ Characteristics data-driven recommendations
🚗
A balanced choice performance, comfort and price
🛣
For everyday driving city and motorway

Where Kumho ECSTA HS52 stands among comparable tyres

Compared with 34 tyres — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.

weakestbest
This tyre 8,2
Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 2 9.1 32 757 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 4 9.0 42 355 Ft Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 8.9 36 032 Ft Continental ULTRACONTACT NXT 8.8 47 349 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP 2 SUV 8.7 44 499 Ft Bridgestone TURANZA T005 8.6 29 600 Ft Falken AZENIS FK520 8.3 33 130 Ft Kumho ECSTA HS52 8.2 20 845 Ft This tyre Pirelli CINTURATO P7 (P7C2) 8.2 46 010 Ft Hankook K135 ventus Prime4 8.2 29 307 Ft Nokian Tyres WETPROOF 1 8.1 22 605 Ft Bridgestone TURANZA 6 8.1 37 039 Ft Hankook K125A VENTUS PRIME3 X 8.0 22 586 Ft Falken ZIEX ZE310EC 7.9 25 705 Ft Falken AZENIS FK510A AO 7.9 41 502 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC 7.8 28 752 Ft Toyo PROXES COMFORT 7.8 22 488 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO P7 7.7 29 163 Ft Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 7.6 29 174 Ft Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 7.6 22 499 Ft Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 2 7.6 47 849 Ft Continental CONTIPREMIUMCONTACT 5 7.5 43 933 Ft Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 1 7.4 42 998 Ft Vredestein ULTRAC+ 7.3 27 586 Ft Kumho HS51 7.2 34 233 Ft Pirelli SCORPION VERDE 7.2 45 203 Ft Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 7.2 24 326 Ft Nokian Tyres Wetproof SUV 7.2 Nexen N'FERA PRIMUS 7.0 28 379 Ft Firestone ROADHAWK 7.0 39 614 Ft Sava INTENSA HP 2 6.8 21 755 Ft Pirelli CINTURATO P1 6.8 47 766 Ft Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 6.5 16 998 Ft Barum BRAVURIS 5HM 5.0 27 111 Ft
5,0 median 7,8 9,1
8. rank in the group of 34 compared
71 % of tyres are weaker in this group
+0,4 above the group median group median 7,8
−0,9 behind the best in the group the best has 9,1
Show all tyres in the ranking (34)
  1. 1. 9.1 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 2 32 757 Ft
  2. 2. 9.0 Michelin PRIMACY 4 42 355 Ft
  3. 3. 8.9 Michelin PRIMACY 4+ 36 032 Ft
  4. 4. 8.8 Continental ULTRACONTACT NXT 47 349 Ft
  5. 5. 8.7 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP 2 SUV 44 499 Ft
  6. 6. 8.6 Bridgestone TURANZA T005 29 600 Ft
  7. 7. 8.3 Falken AZENIS FK520 33 130 Ft
  8. 8. 8.2 Kumho ECSTA HS52 This tyre 20 845 Ft
  9. 8. 8.2 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 (P7C2) 46 010 Ft
  10. 8. 8.2 Hankook K135 ventus Prime4 29 307 Ft
  11. 11. 8.1 Nokian Tyres WETPROOF 1 22 605 Ft
  12. 11. 8.1 Bridgestone TURANZA 6 37 039 Ft
  13. 13. 8.0 Hankook K125A VENTUS PRIME3 X 22 586 Ft
  14. 14. 7.9 Falken ZIEX ZE310EC 25 705 Ft
  15. 14. 7.9 Falken AZENIS FK510A AO 41 502 Ft
  16. 16. 7.8 Vredestein ULTRAC 28 752 Ft
  17. 16. 7.8 Toyo PROXES COMFORT 22 488 Ft
  18. 18. 7.7 Pirelli CINTURATO P7 29 163 Ft
  19. 19. 7.6 Goodyear EFFICIENTGRIP PERFORMANCE 29 174 Ft
  20. 19. 7.6 Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 2 22 499 Ft
  21. 19. 7.6 Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 2 47 849 Ft
  22. 22. 7.5 Continental CONTIPREMIUMCONTACT 5 43 933 Ft
  23. 23. 7.4 Nokian Tyres POWERPROOF 1 42 998 Ft
  24. 24. 7.3 Vredestein ULTRAC+ 27 586 Ft
  25. 25. 7.2 Kumho HS51 34 233 Ft
  26. 25. 7.2 Pirelli SCORPION VERDE 45 203 Ft
  27. 25. 7.2 Fulda ECOCONTROL HP 24 326 Ft
  28. 25. 7.2 Nokian Tyres Wetproof SUV
  29. 29. 7.0 Nexen N'FERA PRIMUS 28 379 Ft
  30. 29. 7.0 Firestone ROADHAWK 39 614 Ft
  31. 31. 6.8 Sava INTENSA HP 2 21 755 Ft
  32. 31. 6.8 Pirelli CINTURATO P1 47 766 Ft
  33. 33. 6.5 Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 16 998 Ft
  34. 34. 5.0 Barum BRAVURIS 5HM 27 111 Ft
Price per 100 km

The tyre's real value for money

20 845 Ft ÷ 41 672 km × 100
50 Ft / 100 km

Lowest price in size 185/60 R14 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.

Comparison with alternatives
Kumho ECSTA HS52 50 Ft
Nexen N'BLUE HD PLUS 61 Ft
Bf goodrich ADVANTAGE 84 Ft

Of the tyres compared, Kumho ECSTA HS52 has the lowest cost per 100 km.

Specifications

Technical information

Our classification not an official manufacturer classification

Focus: Standard

The largest and best-selling category, and Kumho ECSTA HS52 belongs to it. No single property is pushed here at the expense of the others — comfort, grip, noise and tread life keep a sensible balance. For most drivers it is the safest bet: the tyre behaves predictably in the dry and in the wet and covers a decent number of kilometres.

Eco
Eco
Eco-standard
Eco-standard
Standard
Standard
Standard-sport
Standard-sport
Sport
Sport
Supersport
Supersport
Manufacturer Kumho
Tread ECSTA HS52
Season Summer
Vehicle type Passenger car
Focus Standard
Construction Radial
Creation date 29.12.2023
Product launch date (gen.) 02.07.2023
Available technologies

Select a size to display technologies.

Comparison

Competitors

Main competitors in the same price range.

Select a tyre to compare with Kumho ECSTA HS52.
Test history

Which tests it appeared in

Total tests 4×
Wins 0×
Top 3 1×
Average placement 6,3
2026
9. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 225/50 R17 2026
16 tyres
Detail →
2024
5. place
Auto Bild Test letných pneumatík 205/55 R16 2024
20 tyres
Detail →
3. place
ADAC Summer Tire Test 215/55 R17 2024
16 tyres
Detail →
2023
8. place
Tyrereviews Summer Tire Test 205/55 R16 2023
13 tyres ·Premiere
Detail →
Price history

How the price has evolved

Select a size and we'll show how its price has evolved.

User reviews

What owners say

4,0
★★★★☆
from 22 reviews
Click to filter reviews
Expected lifespan
41 672 km
Reliability:confidence-high
17
17***@noreg.com
Peugeot 207 1.6hdi 9Sport) · 225/45 R17 · 16 093 km
★★★★★

<p>Simply great tyres compared to their price. Very good dry grip (I didn’t try their wet grip as it rarely rains where I live). Road noise is noticeably low & wear is minimal.
I recommended them to my friends and they are all happy with them.</p>

RO
ro***@abv.bg
Skoda Octavia · 195/65 R15 · 563 km
★★★★★

Coming from Lassa Greenways, this is a definite improvement in all categories, the tyre feels very direct with a nice bite into the corners. It has incredible road feedback giving you a lot of confidence. As for comfort it's not all that noisy, especially compared to the Lassa's, as for comfort they are a bit hard though not annoyingly so.
Some reviews say that they feel a bit of an imbalance when doing 110-130km/h and I can confirm got that as well, though it did clear up as they are driven(broken in).
You do feel the bumps and imperfections in the road a lot(but Bulgarian roads are harsh no matter the tyre really).
First impressions are that this tyre is definitely worth the money, especially for the price point they are at, 50 euro a tyre is incredible.

EL
el***@web.de
Skoda octavia estate 4x4 · 225/45 R17 · 16 093 km
★★★★☆

I bought these tires to replace a set of Goodyear EfficientGrip 1 that were on the car when I bought it (used). I drove the goodyear tires for about one month before replacing them due to age. The main difference between those tires is the fuel consumption. With the goodyears, I managed to get around 4.8L/100km while on the Kumhos, the car needs 5.2l/100km on the same journey.
Dry grip is excellent, I have not hit the ABS in the dry yet. Also cornering is absolutly fine.
Wet grip is also quite good, although I have hit the ABS a few times and broke the tires loose once when having to merge onto the Autobahn from a standstill. They outperform the (8 year old) Goodyears that were on the car before by quite some margine.
Comfort is fine, although they seem to be a bit louder than the goodyears.
The tires tend to get slightly flatspotted when parking for a few days. This causes a bit of a vibration that goes away after driving for a few kilometers. Neither the goodyears or the wintertires that are on the car now (Vredestein) do that.
The wear on these tires seems to be relativly low. I ran them for 15.000km this summer and they still have 6-6,5mm left. They had a bit more than 7.5mm when new. I expect them to last for another 30-40k km before needing to be replaced due to wear.
As I am working in forestry, I also drive these tires on forest dirt and gravel roads. On there, they are absolutly fine as long as its dry but get very slippery on dirt as soon as it gets wet. On some kinds of gravel, it feels like driving on ice when its wet, however thats more related to the kind of gravel (limestone) and not so much the tire. Every summertire I had so far showed this behavior. This part off the review has not been taken into account when rating the tire.

F.
f.***@hotmail.com
Honda Civic Diesel · 215/50 R17 · 24 140 km
★★★★☆

I find them quite good in the dry, even in dynamic driving. The wear is also very good, after more than 15,000 km.
But I&#39;m extremely disappointed in the wet - in lateral support. On changes of surface in turns, or in roundabouts, I have to take it easy on the roads where I ride. So, it&#39;s not catastrophic, but it slips where I don&#39;t have problems with a Continental (the kumho is supposedly at the same level in the &quot;tests&quot; ).
When braking in a straight line, it didn&#39;t bother me.
It&#39;s better than Chinese, but I wouldn&#39;t buy it again for myself. I regularly and easily reach the limit of grip in corners when it&#39;s raining, even when I think I&#39;m going slowly enough, I don&#39;t like it.

ER
er***@hotmail.com
Volkswagen Passat B7 · 235/45 R17 · 25 750 km
★★★☆☆

This tire is definitely a good choice for average users, unfortunately, based on my experience and usage, the tire did not perform well. It provides adequate lateral grip on both wet and dry roads, but it spins easily when accelerating and I do not feel confident when braking either. Probably due to the way it was used or a manufacturing defect, the tire started to wear out after the first season. This was the second season I've run it, and I feel like it's time for a change. The tread is now very badly damaged and I don't feel safe. 26.000 km / 16.000 miles

Do you drive on these tyres?

Sign in and write a review — you'll help others choose.

Sign in