Sailun Basic ATREZZO ZSR2
Which sizes it's made in
Select width → profile → rim diameter in turn.
For a more accurate search, please enter your size — select the width, profile and rim diameter above.
Price comparison across shops
Select a size and we'll compare prices across shops.
How the Atrezzo ZSR2 evaluated
Wet 93 what it consists of Wet (3)
Dry 87 what it consists of Dry (2)
Economy 10 what it consists of Economy (2)
Noise and comfort 32 what it consists of Noise and comfort (2)
Customer reviews are not part of PTI – PTI is based solely on measurements from independent tests.
Where Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 stands among comparable tyres
Compared with 32 tyres — same season and focus. All are on offer and have results from independent tests.
Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 9.7 34 588 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 6 9.6 38 557 Ft 
Michelin PILOT SPORT 4 9.4 42 068 Ft 
Michelin PILOT SPORT 5 9.3 49 274 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 ASYMMETRIC 5 9.0 35 785 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA SPORT 8.5 45 356 Ft 
Kumho PS72 8.4 31 775 Ft 
Hankook K127 VENTUS S1 EVO3 8.3 39 933 Ft 
Pirelli P-ZERO (PZ4) S.C. 8.0 41 134 Ft Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 8.0 32 579 Ft This tyre 
Vredestein ULTRAC PRO 7.9 43 500 Ft 
Dunlop SPORT MAXX RT 2 7.8 36 756 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 3 7.8 38 557 Ft 
Goodyear EAGLE F1 (ASYMMETRIC) 2 7.7 57 259 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA SPORT 7.7 27 179 Ft 
Kumho ECSTA PS71 7.7 32 833 Ft 
Uniroyal RAINSPORT 5 7.6 24 133 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA SPORT SUV 7.4 36 477 Ft 
Continental CONTISPORTCONTACT 5 7.3 35 271 Ft 
Bridgestone POTENZA S001 7.2 52 162 Ft 
Yokohama V107 7.2 40 233 Ft 
Fulda SPORTCONTROL 2 7.1 31 319 Ft 
Debica PRESTO UHP 2 7.1 32 189 Ft 
Sava INTENSA UHP 2 7.0 28 689 Ft 
Pirelli PZERO 7.0 47 351 Ft 
Kumho PS91 ECSTA 7.0 52 779 Ft 
Vredestein ULTRAC VORTI+ 6.8 45 634 Ft 
Yokohama V701 6.7 27 441 Ft 
Laufenn LK01 S FIT EQ+ 6.7 22 021 Ft 
Nexen N'FERA RU1 6.4 42 027 Ft 
Yokohama V105 6.2 31 709 Ft 
Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport 6.0 43 452 Ft Gripmax SureGrip Pro Sport 43 452 Ft 9.7 best in the group Hankook K137A VENTUS EVO SUV 34 588 Ft Show all tyres in the ranking (32)
- 1. 9.7 34 588 Ft
- 2. 9.6 38 557 Ft
- 3. 9.4 42 068 Ft
- 4. 9.3 49 274 Ft
- 5. 9.0 35 785 Ft
- 6. 8.5 45 356 Ft
- 7. 8.4 31 775 Ft
- 8. 8.3 39 933 Ft
- 9. 8.0 41 134 Ft
- 9. 8.0 32 579 Ft
- 11. 7.9 43 500 Ft
- 12. 7.8 36 756 Ft
- 12. 7.8 38 557 Ft
- 14. 7.7 57 259 Ft
- 14. 7.7 27 179 Ft
- 14. 7.7 32 833 Ft
- 17. 7.6 24 133 Ft
- 18. 7.4 36 477 Ft
- 19. 7.3 35 271 Ft
- 20. 7.2 52 162 Ft
- 20. 7.2 40 233 Ft
- 22. 7.1 31 319 Ft
- 22. 7.1 32 189 Ft
- 24. 7.0 28 689 Ft
- 24. 7.0 47 351 Ft
- 24. 7.0 52 779 Ft
- 27. 6.8 45 634 Ft
- 28. 6.7 27 441 Ft
- 28. 6.7 22 021 Ft
- 30. 6.4 42 027 Ft
- 31. 6.2 31 709 Ft
- 32. 6.0 43 452 Ft
The tyre's real value for money
Lowest price in size 225/50 R17 divided by the estimated mileage from tests and reviews.
Of the tyres compared, Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 has the lowest cost per 100 km.
Technical information
Focus: Sport
With sport tyres, grip in every situation is what decides — under hard acceleration, under braking, in the dry and in the wet. Sailun ATREZZO ZSR2 belongs to this group. Stability at higher speeds and precision through corners come on top of that. One thing drivers often underestimate when buying: grip comes from a softer compound, and a softer compound wears faster. Where a standard tyre covers roughly 40,000 km, a sport tyre manages about 20,000 to 30,000 km — and considerably less with a sharper driving style or a heavier, more powerful car.
Select a size to display technologies.
Competitors
Main competitors in the same price range.
Which tests it appeared in
0× 
1× 
How the price has evolved
Select a size and we'll show how its price has evolved.
What owners say
The Sailun Atrezzo ZSR2 tires are decent budget summer tires, but they have some noticeable weaknesses. On a car with a well-tuned chassis like the BMW G21, they lack steering precision and overall handling compared to better-quality tires. Despite being properly balanced, they also developed vibrations that were most likely caused by temporary flat spots after standing. Noise levels are acceptable—they are moderately quiet, but nothing exceptional. Overall, they offer reasonable value for the price, but I would not buy them again.
Good price preformace
Running ZSR2 on my Tesla Model 3 Performance. On paper, the specs are great (EU label B/A/69dB), and they are honestly quiet and comfy for daily driving. However, wet grip is a weak point—I find the ESC kicking in too easy on wet corners.
The wear rate is the real dealbreaker: 1.6mm (rear) and 1.0mm (front) gone in just 2,500 miles. At this rate, even with frequent rotations, they’ll hit the wear bars by 12,300 miles. They might be cheap to buy, but the poor longevity makes them a bad value in the long run.
Tires wore out rather quickly, got one season out of them, lasted more like 20K Km if even that, otherwise good enough grip on dry and wet tarmac, kind of squirrelly/ not very confidence inspiring on gravel, although thats to be expected.
Moved from worn out PZero pz4 (the rears were had 4mm left so stored in case new fronts wear out earlier) and have to say mpg is 22.2 for a L320 4.2 SC RRS which is a wee bit better than the Pirelli’s with road hum reduced at 70+mph. Great alternative although I only expect them to last maybe 10-13K miles whereas the previous lasted 18-20 but at just half the price. Bodes well.